Halle Estate, GAC, Helsinki

This article will discuss recent events I’ve been to, such as visiting the Halle Estate, the German-American Conference, traveling through parts of Europe, a model of Eastern, Western, and Southern races and their respective interests and temperaments, plus some more abstract models of people such as “vines and trees,” “water versus steel.” In the end I remark upon my hopes for peace, though grasp of such may be uncertain in our present times, as we await the ending years of the 2020s and move into the 2030s.

I apologize if I offend anyone in advance. It is meant to be systematic analysis, not a personal attack, but you may perceive it as threatening your core interests.

Atlanta and the Halle Estate

Some remarks on recent events. Drove down to Atlanta for a CBYXAA (Congress-Bundestag Youth Exchange Alumni Association) meeting, but really wanted to check out the Halle Estate which was a replica of Klaus Halle’s house in Silesia before the war. Much of the time I spent looking around and perusing the bookshelf.

First night was at a restaurant, second was in the morning at a coffee shop and then at MLK memorial in downtown Atlanta (most of it was closed due to government shut down). It was shabby and a guy tried to hustle us for money by giving a poem at first then asking for donations.

Remarks on personalities

People have mostly come to expect this type of behavior from Bantus, like that one time I went to a Jamaican tailor and she wouldn’t tell me the price to fix a single hole in a shirt. Only after asking her did she want to say it was $20.

American Southern whites seem to exhibit this behavior too. At a car shop in Georgia, the shop tried to bamboozle me by first being ‘friendly’ and then charging for high prices. She seemed to expect that I would already have a set deal without hearing the price, even putting the tag on the keys to distinguish different drivers.

We will speak on these different communication styles later in the article. They seem to expect that a first impression of ‘friendliness’ overrides underlying negative realities such as high prices, inefficiencies, low quality, saying one thing and doing another thing.

An analogy may be “peach versus coconut” communication styles. If coconuts think peaches are liars, and peaches think coconuts are hostile, then we are sort of stuck.

I do recognize the harshness of said statements. This mainly is with regards to business dealings, where I think my temperament fits a polite, cordial, detached, and efficient attitude as opposed to the gregarious, personable, yet I cannot help but feel scheming attitude.

---

Atlanta, it is both dirty and messy but in some ways represents a hope of West Africa’s people unless there is some development in Lagos and like that I know not of. The inner city culture of the 2010s is residing and they too are moving to the suburbs. The unknown question of our upcoming decades is whether the South creates cities comparable to those in the North. For all talk of Austin, it leaves much to be desired, yet the boulevards of Philadelphia remain the past and not the present. I am rooting for their success but not blinded by false hopes and potentiation.

Meme of Atlanta

On the estate and old culture

It is only by holding true to the values of the Old West, the communication norms and factual style that the West can renew itself. In my childhood we had these dark wooden shelves, reams of encyclopedias (search up American People’s Encyclopedia, it is a distinct aesthetic.), and an appendix with facts and words of levels upon levels. The emotional patterns of communication are at odds with the technological patterns of communication, and without changing the fundamental usage of the language (which may be predicated upon biology too) the chance of further development is low.

The society now is best characterized as a “mass media” culture, and this too has bled into politics. The form of the present time is intimately shaped with the communication methods that describe it, and without such forms of detail and literacy in the digital form we will neither interpret not experience the world in the same way as the old society.

The common criticism levied against the older style is too much memorization of impertinent information, for which much time is expended with little gain. This, admittedly, deserves some truth in a world of intensifying pyramidal-shaped competition squeezing the top. Indexing on only one parameter (such a single postsecondary exam) decreases qualitative growth in other areas. Yet a base emotionalism of ‘skibidi’ and ‘rizz’ serves no capability for the abstractions and technologies we all depend upon for daily living, becoming instead a redistribution of existing wealth along emotional signaling words to show alignment to a certain tribe. Nevertheless, those at the bottom are better prone to taking action and new words than those at the top, who are often only used to only repeating.

Without changes in the norms and patterns of communication, the production of wealth is inherently hindered. Much blame goes to the Southern races and their higher inherent tendencies of base emotionalism and how they have shifted the dialogue and culture of the United States, turbocharged by the shift from paper to digital communications.

Some think that by inhabiting these buildings of old, they are comparable to the founders of the society, but buildings and material constructions are the phenotype of values, and the inability to construct similar buildings shows a difference in one’s value system and what people are now capable of. At the end of all this I have arrived at similar thoughts to Martin Luther: you cannot sell prestige or badges like indulgences, but that each person has inherent dignity from the way they act and conduct themselves. Faith and God can come to each person regardless of any governing authority. This is a style of life open to any country, race, sex, or manner of self-identification. Every person can interpret the natural world, read research papers, and come to their own conclusions and act upon what they personally have interpreted as scripture that is open to all; it is not the sole dominion of priests, ‘Science’, and this approximation of real research we better know today as ‘scientism’.

Some are unfortunately beyond helping nor do they want aid, and this is a reality we must face in every society. This old man I gave a bottle refund to, next time I see him in the store he’s buying a bunch of alcohol. A homeless-seeming lady in the McDonalds glancing at the passerbys scanning for a sign of human connection, I give her a snack from my meal, then she asks me if I have a good hotel. Not my intention. If the person on the street is like this and wants to do this then I’m thinking the only benefit of it isn’t even to them but to the average citizens’ daily experience and the leaders’ conscience should it be present in full form.

The emotional disorder has made it to parts once stable; a certain generation is of age now. I was on the Deutsche Bahn in November 2025 and this employee dropped a paper towel wad onto the ground. I pointed it out to her and she kicked it away and pretended it did not exist. She devalued Deutsche Bahn by her actions and any groups associated with her. Every time you try to show off what school you go to or put it in your social media header, you devalue it. Prestige is self-destructing because the more you use it, the fewer people eventually get impressed, which leads to finding sources from ever more low quality people, thus completely destroying the original prestige. Many things in life are like single-use matches; you have to make it count.

There are more of the Instagram-aesthetic women like this now in actual functional roles in society, which is probably bad for the functioning of the society. Makeup is inherently consumptive, as are mirrors, because it directs the attention toward oneself as opposed to the world around them. Saw one of these people on the DB and a few of them in the supermarkets in Finland working the base-level cashier roles. There is something lost in society when those working at the base are angry, underpaid minority workers or Instagram-aesthetic woman who fell through the cracks as opposed to stable people of that society itself, as the cafeteria workers in my first through twelveth grades were. I miss their friendly faces deeply, there was somehow a deep kindness you could see in them that some of the workers today seem to lack, because they feel not part of the society itself.

People who mark themselves with plastic surgeries and tattoos have taken themselves out of the running for decent society, as it shows a preference for showing-off, gratification, lack of long-term thinking. Yet as I sit here thinking my words are too harsh being guided by such sentiments as forgiveness, I am reminded of the callousness and lies that such people treated others with, and I feel myself ready to extinguish the light which holds the charity shop open. Yet need I do such a thing? Every day their hollow faces and puffed up lips are a reminder to everyone else of the dangers of narcissism.

Of course, the corollary to the above is: “haha, your ideas are weak, the left has won, why should we listen to you?” (1) if people continuing acting this way, they will consume all the stocks and destroy themselves. This can go on for quite a long time. (2) those with strict standards of association and wealth production will cluster themselves away from the rest.

In my elementary school we never littered; we would go out together as a class to pick up trash. I carry these values to this day; I carry such dignities to this day even as I see people all around me abandoning them.

Mr. Halle came from a renowned family but because of the war lost everything. Would he even call it a mansion? Or is that a word that only poor people use to describe large things which they cannot comprehend? I met a woman from my high school but she described things as the ‘orchestra track’—but that’s like describing things like as ‘Beethoven’ or ‘classical music’—it just strikes as off because it was something more than a track. It was life, so to speak. Furthermore, her intense levels of emotionalism in expression made me wary of being around her as the older ways were not like that, like one who asks for photos taken of themselves are consumptive.

This further differentiation among people, coupled perhaps with some unwillingness to elaborate on things for other people seeing them as not knowing it or getting it, does inhibit the sense of community and collaboration among all peoples. Yet time is limited, you can only talk to so many without pursuing your own needs, and it is very difficult for people to overcome inherent sense of disgust for people who are different to be able to speak in an egalitarian way - (this applies along multiple dimensions: dating, levels of schooling, politics, etc.).

Order and Disorder, Northern and Southern races

Some people stayed to visit around the Beltline, but I’d already been and found it grimy/full of graffiti masked as art and the insincerity of newly built facades and so I didn’t see much of a point. That analogy, speaks for much of the politick of the United States today: Bantus and emotional American Whites (I will explain the nature of American Whites, and why they either bias toward emotional or technological and systematic categories later) draw pictures and hoist flags over elevators and construction they themselves cannot make, Atlanta-based ?artists? draw and color sneakers/shirts yet are limited by Gildan (the T-shirt brand) rather than industrializing to make their own shirts by focusing on seam type or fabric type. I do not blame them but I see their style lives in the foundations of others as ornaments.

The above pattern of noise and color seems to be characteristic of the Southern races: the Bantus, Indians, perhaps even those of Southeast Asia and Southern China.

I felt that in the styles of temples in Taiwan, the northern style of order and structure became ornamented and distorted. Not differentiated, as in the northern style of greater technology, but a perversion of architecture with the superfluous. Many of the Southern temperaments say and ornament their speech with parts unnecessary.

Does there seem to be significant difference between the Taiwanese and Indian temple? The Northern aesthetic is distinguished; it is distinctly itself different from both other northern temples and the southern heterogeneity. Like gases become more diffuse at hot temperatures, so do hot climates affect the preciseness of vocabulary and engineering precision of humans.

In the National Taiwan Museum, I felt something—external constructions which are patterns of life given certain time and certain place, in that visiting the Halle Estate was time travel. It was a trace of the United States and the Old West—a museum with two wings/staircases on each side, rich wooden interiors, and somehow the wooden paneling even seemed the right height.

Unfortunately, the United States of today doesn’t seem to offer museums and civilization. The patterns instead emanating are: hotels without soap for ‘environmental’ reasons, denuclearization, and weird-looking homosexuals. An “American supermarket” in Berlin was full of junk food and pop-tarts. This is mostly a coastal and mass media cultural problem. It is the parts of the Old West and the Midwest Industrialism that I still think have much to offer to the world, but they are sort of hidden away in the daily life. I will write about this in a future post.

I’ve always been somewhat biased against those who enjoy the ugly and disturbing, and I think perhaps if the leaders were of both great beauty and sound mind the benefits to society would be multifold. Because in the beautiful people I often sense greater goods and sensitive attenuations to emotion, a capable intellect and depths of feeling. That beauty and intelligence might be inversely correlated is some parts statistical sampling error and self-indulgent lies.

Therefore, if the United States of generations past against the Soviet Union was like two men in a bar brawling it out, this current conflict between the USA and PRC is like water against steel. Both the USA and PRC exhibit a division between temperaments of north and south, while countries such as Canada, many European countries, are exclusively northern temperament but becoming increasingly southern temperament over time due to food degradation such as vegetable oils and migration while those to the south probably consist of people with majority southern temperament with a few northern temperament classes and enclaves, only once again becoming northern in the lower latitudes near Argentina, Chile, South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.

But because the world-shape makes it so that these northern temperament lower latitudes are peninsulas: they are far from each other—most action across the world will happen across the northern hemisphere.

My analogy on architecture does raise more questions about Russia’s St. Basil’s Cathedral: such onions and colors seem to be southern in style—why what seems like such a northern race have such ornamented styles? One potential answer: the principle of contrast. What is rare in one place becomes more valuable. No enjoyment of summer vacations without winter, like how American pop music feels at times a warm reprive from the Nordic cold. But when everything around you is messy and dirty like Germany’s train stations with roaming homeless and yelling, this music is adding disorder upon mess.

Things used to be nice; the fountains would run and the trains came on time, the stations were clean and not so grimy. You’d go to a museum or hospital and the Rube Goldberg machine spins around and around all for free, mesmerizing the children. Ah, the old West and the old world. Now you have to pay coins to make these little trains run in Heidelberg Hauptbahnhof, it was a nice reprieve like a camp fire in winter but I pressed the buttons too many times so I used up all ten spin-arounds and it became cold again.

Supposedly there are more of them. I smile when I come back to the USA and see the insane light-up Santa displays pulsating at 200x a minute. I used to think they were dumb but as I get older and life is tiring these small things matter in ways only those who have taken a long and tiring journey would understand.

---

The German-American Conference

• Oh, people would ask if I studied there. In the eyes of normal people the university system still holds significant social acclaim so for independent innovators there’s a lot of pre-selection that they can’t pass easily.
  • People who studied here, if there are too many students and people coming in then it’s exhausting to filter and select for all of them
• Two people were basically deaf and could not hear me speaking in a loud room, or distinguish my voice, because they partied/club/techno too much
• Smith center at Harvard had a mosque, it had laminate flooring. Iceland airport too. So I guess this is here to stay, damnit.
• Sometimes, old people act stupid and stubborn in their ways. Does it make sense to show them their ways are wrong? Words often do not change their stubbornness. Does it make sense to teach old people a harsh lesson?
• Idea based classifications are stronger than race based classifications. A multiethnic Muslim or Jewish crowd proves this, as does a trans-global, transatlantic elite.

Other miscellaneous thoughts:

• Bundeswehr +40,000 per year. Possible? Ambitious?
• There was someone from Vienna who was a musician with dark hair and eyes—but the last name did not seem German in a Germanic way like Mueller, Lieber, etc., it was ‘Gutdeutsch’ which means ‘Good German.’ Roma, perhaps? Not that I would discriminate only that I found it interesting.

---

This is a pattern I’ve seen a few times, including at the conference.

For those with Southern temperament (some African-Americans, Indians), it is good if they keep the technological whites distracted on China rather than on them domestically. Living in Africa or India is not preferable for them. They recognize this fact and know their patronage depends upon those on the American left (or right, whoever is in power—it doesn’t matter) who will support them being ideological followers. In a society where excellence and quality is valued they would not be able to float to the top.

Rush Doshi continuing his anti-China shtick, commentary is starting to become mixed at this point. At some point if you keep heading down a specific path there’s no going back. I’ll talk about it later on in my triangular model, but South wants East and West to fight, and South is embedded within the West itself.

• Many people had what I saw as recurring and prototypical features of their group:

  • Fast talking Indians that nominally sound good (totally random theory, but what if fast talking Indians are lower castes imitating a Northern Indian accent similar to the American mid-Atlantic accent?) but these days I tune out the style because I believe these arguments are more sophistry of sounding good than logic

  • African-Americans needing small-world society social acclaim, kudos, and sycophancy but not being as moved by moral values

  • Midwesterner who is genuinely nice

    • I fear a bit for these people in a globalized world, for there are many people who do not see things the way they do.

  • I met some people from China: one from Shaanxi and one from Yunnan. There is something fearsome about the nature of Chinese governance that women from the central region are perhaps all to familiar with and I saw the characteristic fear and anxiety on her face I have seen only once before but well enough to recognize it. What did I even do to cause it?

    • A pattern: women near the imperial core yearn for the warmer places, those in the periphery yearn for the core. It is not all too infrequent for American white women to go to Spanish speaking places. The woman from Yunnan had slightly more interest than the one from Shaanxi, who seemed to fear me.
      • Supposedly the abstract things I say sometimes sound scary, like “countries are basically anthills” and “restaurants are a wrapper around food wholesalers.”

  • A guy who grew up in East Germany to Russian parents, he really hated learning the language:

    • If you deny what is, then you cannot face the truth easily I think. He seemed to cover it up with drinking and partying: even though I could hear him clearly over the loud music, he could not hear me. It suggests that raves blast out the human vocal range of hearing like a band pass filter somehow.

  • Men who come from weak families are often weak, women are temperamental and lustful.

  • Of women with good biological development (that is, their mothers were healthy and they prenatally were able to come to term) often reflected in their proportions (tend to be taller, good bone structure, natural beauty that needs little makeup) there is often an orientation toward what is good and right.

I think at this conference, there are a not-insignificant amount of older West Germans who may believe in ideas such as looting the East Germans. One guy told me Germany reunified after East/West, not in the 1870s with Bismarck. I asked a guy who was a climate scientist if it was related to preventing developing countries from industrializing and he just walked away. This could be guilt, or it could be him believing my claims were stupid and him not realizing the realpolitik itself.

I chatted with the German Consulate General of New York while we were in line for a bit on the second day. He seemed to not like the suggestion that he could potentially skip the line (as speakers had a different registration in the beginning of the conference). I told him I read Klaus Halle’s bookshelves and he wanted to exit the conversation as fast as possible. I don’t know if he thought of himself as German or German in the American way, but I suspect the former.

The first day we had an opening at the Memorial Church. There were a few sections (rather than official panels or talks) that I believed to be the most informative based on people’s reactions and feelings.

To be honest, keeping abroad of the latest geopol X.com and major publications is enough information-wise; conferences are mainly networking, which in dialogue some people are surprised with because they are not living at the leading edge of mental hallucination and caught off-guard.

East and West

The first was the quartet music: first, by a group of Westerners, and second, by a group of Easterners. The technical playing ability and depths of complexity expressed by those of the East surpassed those of the West—the room echoed and warped as sound reverberated across the hall yet the response and applause was muted, if not chilly. My theory of mind for those in the West is a sense of discomfort, and perhaps fear, that another type of people would take the instruments and technology of Western Civilization and master it. To them, it was almost too perfect.

The Western quartet, on the other hand, struggled to find its own voice. Among the youth there is not the same diligence, attention to craft, expertise, rigor, and temperament that built this society.

I felt this same loss while walking around the Halle Foundation. Putting cute photos around the estate does no justice to the beauty of the house itself. The West had this most wonderful civilization, and it saddens me the people turned away from it.

The young attendees at the conference perhaps did not see the challenge and test of nerve their leaders now faced: they lived in their bubble, feeling good, thinking they are at the top still.

This pretense of arrogance is not exclusive to any one group, whether you are Chinese stubbornly talking about 5,000 years of history (I am thinking of family members who say this yet live in a dirty room), Americans pretending they are the best, Europeans who work as Lidl cashiers or flight attendants yet tries to keep people out and doesn’t greet them. It is in the long run a serious negative to quality, though delusions are able to persist for quite a long time as the notion their life might be a sham is held up by the daily and active ignorance to it. I am opposed to arrogance, self-indulgence, lies, ignorance, and other such vices no matter in what form, person, or race they appear in.

The Bantu-Judeo Left

The speech by someone high in the American government during the Obama administration confirmed this pattern I’ve been seeing. She described (to a bunch of Germans, who are not ‘white people’) that ‘we’ had to atone for our sins, Italians were considered ‘Black’ when first arriving to the United States, and that our leaders were ‘weak’. This mostly seemed nonsensical to the Germans but I will parse it for people here.

First, women live in an idea world, and seek to impress herself upon the characteristics of men. Because she was speaking in an Obama-style with enunciations of the words to communicate information (like, we have HOPE, we have PEACE, we have LOVE!) rather than long strings of nouns and verbs like the mid-Atlantic accent, the origins of this “white people” discrimination only could have come from African-Americans and Obama, also using DEI to put their people into positions of power.

Slogans such as “defund the police” and the non-prosecution of criminals were meant to create domestic terror where the State supported the most thuggish elements of society against law-abiding citizens, the lack of rigor from Obama’s continuation of No Child Left Behind started by GW Bush, and the cultural shibboleth of “anti-racism” in college essays were meant to elevate a small minority of people beyond anything they could have achieved with their own ability.

While Obama started the “Pivot to Asia,” the simultaneous degeneration and emotionalism of American standards and culture (though it started as early as the 60s with Elvis, music, and counterculture) ensured a formidable challenger to American hegemony while state capacity was itself declining. A race where one is ahead is hard for challengers to catch up on; a race where one runs backwards while the other runs forward is a foregone conclusion. Continuing to pull the strings after leaving office by installing Joe Biden, who clearly was controlled by Obama, his wife, and handlers much like Jiang Zemin pulled the levers of Chinese politics behind the scenes, leftism only peaked after the second election of Donald Trump, who seemed to herald an American decline only that the foundations were set much earlier, as Carroll Quigley born the early 1910s stated in the 1960s that “Georgetown every day is trying to expand bigger and bigger and become like a second Harvard, losing sight of the original mission of education,” and remarked how the students were every day becoming less diligent and attentive.

She was probably regretting the policy decisions of the past few decades, since women do this boundary pushing thing to see who pushes them back and are also more socially aware of the balance of power than men in general, she was trying to see if anyone would understand and take leadership.

Over the past year or so I have seen less DEI hires at the local airport (AGS) (I was shocked to see young males of European descent) and the Alfred C. Sloan Foundation has stopped funding interpretive dance, Indigenous peoples, and “diverse” genders (grift for politically aligned people).

She described her family as Jewish-American growing up in Baltimore, and her parents kept renting out to Bantus despite their business sales going down 40-60% and going bankrupt. This is just a crazy emotional/idealistic decision against your own interests. Stupid stupid stupid stupid stupid, like cutting off your own limbs.

They’re nice people in person. Wish the two sides would reconciliate, she said she hasn’t even met Trump. I think Elon’s temperamentality is somewhat contextually not too correct but understandable and the media/writing makes it too hard to communicate goodwill in this day and age. Moreover, a lot of ‘very online people’ are quite disconnected and/or bitter wrt. the world around them, being around others tends to reduce variance. Maybe they should just sit together for a dinner some day, but maybe when you get to that day and age it becomes too acrimonious. How would Ukraine and Russia even talk today?

But maybe Jews were the ones who were too naive and kindhearted.

Below an excerpt from “Notes of a Native Son.”

I had an 8th grade teacher science teacher named A. Mealing. She believed in me and put me in AP Biology, and she was a kind-hearted Christian too. I am in many ways thankful for that kindness, though I may not be able to exemplify it in the same form.

Baldwin makes a mistake in grouping all ‘whites’ together later on his life, becoming cynical from his treatment in New Jersey not being served, even shattering a glass at a woman in a diner. Rather than seeing everything as top-down identities, we should have bottom-up identites from our own respective family histories.

I would be misleading you if I proclaimed the above to be a book of hate, for it is not, only that such strong emotions will find themselves difficult to subside easily combined with the innate abilities of Bantus being less biased toward abstraction and technology and more toward emotion and all the tribal ills coming from it all but sets their relative economic position in society because economic wealth outside money from entertainment and services is generally that of manufacturing and abstraction. I will write my observations on this in a future article, “Can Bantus Build?”

And we must keep in mind as any society goes a certain direction applying a precise action is difficult, as we only have large blocky levers where the outcome is uncertain, much like Containment against the Soviets was not done to Kennan’s liking, nor is Trump particularly making precise action either.

With regards to Baldwin’s note of the “pattern Gentile and Jew alike had fixed for them,” I do not believe African-Americans must fit into any one societal mold, straightening their hair or toning down their natural, outgoing temperament. For these reasons I prefer those who live in the American South, who are the most natural and happy compared to the jaded-seeming ones in Northern cities. Yet if one were to live in a messier and less orderly society as a consequence of greater emotionalism, an orderly leader would see this natural tendency as the inherent problem itself, trying to contort a plant into a shape it was never meant to grow into. This, of course, is likely to fail, no different from Americans trying to create a 1950s-2010s democracy in Afghanistan. And I do feel from personal experience at the counselor’s office in high school that such people classified into certain ideas of ‘not good student’ were not given their due share in responsive, attentive filling out of papers as might be expected in egalitarianism, yet sometimes some leniency was made for myself and other students.

I do not, go to a majority American Black demographic supermarket and see its relative dirtiness and blame the peoples who are there, no more than I would blame a dog for barking nor a cat for meowing, and furthermore that I see the ways that they relate to each other which may be unnoticed to the undiligent observer; some with a more caring and considerate feeling of mellowness but yet others within what may be called a ‘demographic’ because all words are by nature discrete and not wholly encompassing, seeming to relate in that more pugnacious and dramatic way. And when I see videos of Buganda people in Uganda, sitting around and smiling and all that seems normal, I think of the sorrows of those who were displaced and the certain strife that such rootlessness causes in people and in some ways see in myself, and of that subsequent bleeding over into the edges of other people’s normality. Alas, it may in other ways just be the melancholy of the writers and thinkers in this world.

I wonder if conflict between American Black conservatives and American Black liberals are, like Albion’s seed, inherent conflicts between ancient tribes such as the Kongo, Mende, Mbundu, Wolof, Igbo, Tikar, Ibibio, Fula, Mandinka, and many other such names I am just reading off of Google, some of which may have natural personality closer to prehistoric tribal man and some closer to modern man. That the Bantu was adapted for tribal environments of man against nature and feels excesses of feeling is no inherent problematic issue on its part, only that we must admit such concepts such as selling the air rights above buildings in New York are foreign and difficult to grasp, yet the feelings of emotion, television, radio, and communication common. They seek to speak not to find truths and understanding, but to on average find some sort of concord or agreeance and feeling. Perhaps they would have gone and developed a major history and self-selected for greater tendencies of abstraction over time, if only had the course of world development not been so suddenly interrupted by Europe over the past few centuries by no fault of their own either.

During my visit at the Halle Estate, I saw that Klaus Halle was gifted a book: DIE JUDEN IN DEUTSCHLAND (The Jews in Germany) by Heinz Ganther. Searching for this, of course, is censored by Google. (Note: do you think the Chinese government admits to censoring things in ways similar or different to the US? Sometimes I see military related stuff boosted to the top of Zhihu. I find the argument “this is for state capacity” convincing, but “this will cause extremism and harm” unconvincing.) There was also a book “Russen und Chinesen” by Pietro Quaroni but it was only geopolitical, not about the nature of human beings. Yet I think there is something about the nature of Russians and Chinese despite the wary truce, as Finns and Hungarians, that in temperament lies from Eurasian steppes many many centuries ago, however diluted it may be in our present day, that remains uncertain and up for debate. John Fraser’s CHINA: A Portrait of a People was also there. One of the German chief complaints about foreign influence during the 1930s was this same aforementioned Judeo-Bantu connection, where they tracked a list of plays denoting “foreign influence.”

“Hoboken” refers to Mike Gold’s work - The Song of Hoboken. I see it now, this Judeo-Bantu connection came out of goodwill. Michael knew what it meant to be persecuted, he admired those who saw slaves as fellow human beings and did what was felt morally right. In short, he believed he was fighting the good fight, and it made complete sense given the conditions at the time. But he was perhaps unaware of this “true Bantu nature and culture” that those in the South are more acquainted with.

There is an online document circulating called ”White Supremacy Culture” by Tema Okun who also runs ’https://www.whitesupremacyculture.info/’. Though it has some merits in its acceptance of various peoples’ thoughts, it lists things such as “perfectionism, urgency, worship of the written word, and objectivity” as “white supremacy culture.” In her LinkedIn we once again see this Judeo-Bantu connection.

I’m not trying to exacerbate relations between peoples for the worse, and I do think some of the things being said are reasonable, but the application of these lowered standards of competency over time to an entire society, especially in fields such as education, business, and culture, leads to large-scale dysfunction. It’s not a systematic and structured evil design like WW2 fascist empires, it’s a malign evil of stupidity or feigned ignorance closer to hybrid warfare. If you read one of her interviews and she describes how integration destroyed the black school, it does seem reasonable. But the “True Bantu Culture” is tribal, emotional, and they hide their real nature from other societies.

This all but confirms the structure of the left: a Bantu-Judeo core with nominally ‘white’ leftists and emotional rather than technological temperament. Their secondary or near primary supporters are feminist women. The goal is to take away power from straightforward and systematic men, even if it destroys the overall society. I think LGBT, other minorities such as Native Americans though generally associated are a tertiary level (not the important leadership but part of the club). I believe Indians (they are a large and diverse group so I hate to dragnet all Indians) in the political field also are integrated into this conspiratorial structure, but I have encountered a good amount of Indians in the technology field I find good-natured and well-meaning.

We know this to be confirmed and true by their two sacred pillars: the Nazis and Hitler as some sort of reverse fascist sacrificed Jesus taking on the sins of Western Civilization, and George Floyd as the the ultimate holy lamb who can do no wrong. If you believe, for example, the Nazis were regular people who did evil things, like anyone of any race can do evil, and George Floyd was a career criminal though in some ways the excessive cruelty of cops is unwarranted, then the dialogue can move toward a better direction once Google stops censoring everything. The more they try to censor, which is against the American principle of the First Amendment, the more a resistance builds.

I say Bantu, because I am not saying things against the Amharic peoples of Ethiopia, Eritrea, or Sudan. Nor do I look upon the Khoi-san Capoid people like such. I say Bantu, because the Bantu (and this is still too broad a term!) has a reduced form ear shape that people such as Rwandan president Kagame do not have, indicative of a more primordial existence such as Darwin’s Points. This same “Bantuness” is overrepresented in the American Black demographic, and supposedly some Jews have 5% Bantu blood in them. Moreover, I am not explicitly against Bantus, only that I recognize what their personality tendencies tend to be out of their innate biology as suited for their environment.

I think it’s mainly Bantu-Judeo, but there’s also a Hindu component that is rising. I don’t think the Hindoo, leftist, or feminist factions actively work with the Bantu-Judeo faction, nor do I think there is explicit cooperation even between Bantus and Jews, but they implicitly communicate and are attuned to each other’s speaking patterns. People in the Midwest aren’t like this from my experience, it flys under the radar.

• Bantu: Mayors of major cities. Eric Adams, Karen Bass, London Breed, Brandon Johnson
• Judeo: Major think tanks, the media, finance, university
• Hindu: Rush Doshi, Vivek Ramaswamy, Kash Patel, Usha Vance.

I am, of course, not very thorough in listing out figures of influence, merely those who are more common in the media in our present time, but even such presence does say something. Those who may be behind the scenes, may be of unknown demographics. Lina Khan is Pakistani—whether there is any connection betweeen Pakistan/India/Bangladesh diaspora groups in the US is unknown to me. Pakistanis may also lean toward a Muslim identity. There is no member of any Eastern race in the public eye of America who does not seem like a stooge.

I noticed a pattern with American Jewish professors: they would always joke that the government is stupid, whereas Anglo professors would just be disappointed or mildly exasperated. The usage of the “humor attack” is common in the Judeo-Bantu axis.

One thing that unites many of these groups is that they fundamentally hate strong governments even though the designs of man were what led to our prosperity though that same edge belies the plans of war and devastation. They would sooner hope for a society governed by chaos than one governed by a strong state.

They obviously don’t think of themselves as “whites,” so their real identity is something else. I’ll let you guess.

Source 1, Source 2

I recommend @bronzeagemantis’ thoughts on recent events, where he also seems to have independently recognized this Bantu-Judeo victimization complex as a cornerstone of the left.

I believe the modern Jews in governance wanted an inclusive society or ‘open society’—it was not some sort of conspiracy where they wanted to destroy the structure of a state, it was because I think they saw the destructive power of totalitarianism, had a culture based more on emotion and consumption rather than truth and order, saw the Bantu as a fellow in oppression but did not anticipate their consumption culture beyond that of even the Jews, and felt that women were unduly stuck in place and took their mission to help these oppressed peoples of the world while perhaps not having a realistic understanding of why these positions were like such in the first place.

These people made their way through the East Coast private schools, I believe, in the 60s and 70s. From time to time I have met some of this class: around 170cm tall, bookish, not exactly with the characteristics people prescribe to their ethnic group but not a Greek statue either. Part of their strategy is to appear confusing: it seems like a “white” person is saying these things. Remember, “white” and “Asian” are terms that Bantu-Judeo Color Theory came up with to divide Americans. They really love inconsistencies, so the two terms don’t match 1:1. It’s a baked-in feature of their personality that I mention lower in the article denoted “Western scurrility.”

The Jewish media trick is filtered through the progressive post-Civil Rights ideology, so it seems “whites” are interning Japanese. Since Donald Trump seems like a “white supremacist,” they try to get minority groups against this movement.

I don’t have anything against Israeli Jews as I’ve met a few and things were neutral/positive, though perhaps it’s different at the higher/political coordinator levels. I believe it’s the American Jews that are running social experiments on people.

Everything is actually very confusing. Supposedly Japanese in California were culturally Southern Cavalier planters who had Okies work as slave labor the way that Mexican immigrants do today. And there are Ostjuden and German Jews, some who like Chinese but obviously the recent ones in power don’t.

Everyone’s opinion in a society should be heard. But if you have it completely governed by people who can’t uphold the society, it will destroy itself. So maybe there can be some demographic/ethnic quotas for each group.

And let it be said that I do not advocate for antisemitism in any form: the slayings outside the Washington DC embassy are unwarranted and the harassment of Jewish students across college campuses is meaningless, for the students and young only orient themselves around what the old and political in society have created, and the old have been holding onto power in society for too long. As young we need not necessarily send forward the cycles of competition and hatred. There was this terrible slaying in Australia lately and it is the regular people who care nothing for these games of power that pay the price.

I remember, warmly, how Temple Emeth in Brookline, MA, would shelter us after a gas leak in elementary school—or childhood school habits of spinning dreidels and making latkes. Chabad in university was a place open to all people, and the existence of Israel proves that Jews are not just some stateless people but able to innovate in areas of science and technology with renowned institutions such as Technion.

There was a plaque to the right honoring those who had given their lives to this world. It is their world many of us lived in and grew up in, and though I was not a very devout believer in my youth it is to the State and Federal culture and the religious morals I owe the majority of what has been the good in my life to.

I was a lazy and undevout believer in my youth. I threw snowballs at the principal’s window in elementary school and blobbed the pledge of allegiance with my friend Asad. During the one semester I went to Chinese elementary school during the morning routines I half-assed the exercises and national anthem. Yet, in an era where the 19th-century State is under attack from 21st century Disorder led by Southern races and feminists, which seeks the redistribution of resources for emotional consumption and the poverty and immersiation of us all, I find myself re-awakening the faith in what had raised me and cherished us all as equals.

What we must defend is an Idea, that which is inscribed in the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, the writings of the State Department, the memoirs of Bismarck, the major actors of the French or Russian revolutions, 5,000 years of Chinese history and more. The battle in Ukraine is fundamentally between State and non-State ideologies, where non-State ideologies like Bantu-Judeo leftism are parasites that try to control States to throw them against other States. The left is against history and deep reading, because anyone that understands history will understand what and for what reasons things are being done; they are not naive and easily controlled. I am also convinced most people who call themselves on the “right” actually have the personality temperaments of those on the left, only they are like dogs fighting over different balls.

In my article, ”Fatalism and Romanticism,” I describe why most modern people are liberals, romantics, and tend toward disorder and non-State, non-organized ideologies.

(I had friends or friend-acquaintances from many places. David from Israel, but also South Korea David. I had a classmate Yuri who always put his arm on my desk, Satoshi was a real rowdy mini-beast. There was a girl in 4th grade called Vishni and we were both embarassed because we were standing next to each other in line and people were like “ooh you are dating.” Akash from India, Ghalib from Pakistan. Many more that I just haven’t completely listed.) I’m sure you’re all up to great things. I love you all, in my youth I had hoped perhaps to be part of this society I had grown up in but perhaps there just isn’t anything there anymore. I hope I will happen to cross paths with you all again some day in the future but I’m just not sure I’ll be welcomed until everything in the world blows over and we cross into the next period. The interwar periods are always confusing. Nobody knows who’s on what side and everything is mixed together.

You all probably believe most of the leftist-progressive stuff and had I gone along with you, I think I would’ve as well. I can see my father’s Harvard ID card in a drawer should I go look for it. Two divergent branches and ideologies that split by chance, except I know not of my people these days.

Muslims, Chinese, and now Russians were the only ones in the modern era to challenge the notion of Western supremacy, which is somewhat similar to White supremacy. Except I no longer use the latter term because of the multiethnic groups we now find in American leadership, and the poverty of poor whites in America which is not just a recent, but rather historical phenomenon as those from Oklahoma could attest, though they thought of themselves in religious terms back then.

This chauvinism which developed in the past few decades I believe came from recent immigrants and coddled children; they stand against the universal American values of my youth. If one has pretenses of being the best, such things must be proven. Otherwise everyone gangs up on you because it’s a notion that by its very nature excludes everybody that’s not like you. Pluralism is OK with other people despite differences.

Because I am not willing to speak in a voice that presumes one to be weak and gay, the norms of corporate America will be a poor fit. I feel that some of the Muslim-adjacent males I knew going through college have more difficulty finding jobs. My childhood is where my dedication to pluralism comes from: where we can all be different and ourselves, yet still accept everyone else.

I pledged allegiance to the State and the flag, yet the current elite are not the same values or morals, though they nominally appear the same on the outside.

I actually think my experience growing up in the United States was the best combination of potential places. I grew up in Boston while there was the old American society, then I moved to small-town Augusta before wokeness destroyed the education of the major cities, and then I went to a technology school where they did not have these political problems though the overemphasis on football, consumption, and the school not being a leader in its own right (COVID, they followed the top schools) annoyed me.

My loyalties are to the State values and pattern of values and morals that raised me, and not to some postmodern consumption media machine. (This State culture, I believe, is not specific to any one country, so I tend to support the government no matter where I go, which is why I don’t support Shanghai-feminist robot statues but rather Beijing, or why I support the old American Federal Culture as opposed to Bantu-Judeo small-society goverance). Supporting both Beijing and Washington DC at the same time is not a contradiction, there was a time when both countries fought on the same side of a great global war. The Boxer Indemnity scholarship led to many Chinese students coming to the US to study and the rise of Tsinghua University.

I support wherever there is order, I oppose whoever causes disorder. We are all a product of the State and without which we would have no education, no literacy, no running water nor electricity. In a time where small-society conspiratorial groups attack the government and divide the people, should we not defend that which has made us whole?

Supposedly one of the important part of politics is the friend/enemy distinction (Schmitt). It presents a certain distaste to me, which is often opposite to the openness ideals of technology and science I was used to.

• Dressing up in business formal is not useful because the people who were going to talk to me are going to do so anyways even though I am not in a full piece suit. You can never make people respect you by imitating others or wanting to be close to them because that puts the power with other people, you only gain respect by being yourself and fighting.
• Those who are bad, often imitate those who are good (when they are strong), to get access to resources.

Some pronunciation things:

• Do old people pronounce Europe as Yourup?
• In the Northeast people say U-S-A-I-D instead of U-S AID. Like Y-M-C-A instead of “CHIPS” “BILLS”. The need for a fun-sounding acronym likely represents a degeneration of the English language away from abstraction toward emotion, like Spirit Airlines now says “Government’s Cut.”

Water Fights Steel

Soft power and hard power.

How can water and steel fight? Neither can harm the other. Water, it must drown steel. Steel, it can only enclose water. Neither can directly harm the other.

r/K selection and an open field. As the K-selected tree starts growing it chokes the r-selected grasses, but it takes a long time to get there. A swarm of locusts or fast-growing grasses are very powerful, they can overwhelm in an instant but leave no food for others nor themselves.

In between a wall of steel and an ocean of water there are little iron pellets, people who can do technology. A society governed by water attempts to pick them up and throw them against steel walls. A society of steel picks up these pellets and integrates them into the structure, slowly cupping more areas of water like an encirclement operation.

A society governed by steel accepts more pieces of steel into the structure but water makes it weak, a society governed by water can only accept controllable pieces of steel. The feminist women in control of this structure will say bad things about other people: they are ‘racist’ or whatnot: then, the men who listen take it at face value rather than independently investigating. This keeps them under their thumb.

Technology has the effect where people unable to uphold it breed like rabbits, retarding the development of technology itself.

Vines and trees

Some races and people are like vines, others are like trees. Vines cannot create civilization, but often use words to bargain for a place in it. If the vines are constantly climbing the tree, strangling resources, and going above the tree to block the sun, both die.

I am okay with all different ethnic groups, and I am speaking here in regards to what I see politically. The Indians, that is why they will try to bridge the idea of an India-USA being connected, it is because there is no alternative for them back in India. So they bring up ideas such as “R1b Indo-Aryan MaStER rAcE.” I think the USA will continue to “Indianize” because in Boston, I heard from an Uber driver that the government pays for students to study at top level universities in the USA. That’s fine, times change, it just wouldn’t be the society I grew up in or see myself in.

The other Southern races such as African-Americans, like there was this one dude who went to a New England prep school from Nigeria I met at the conference who took pictures of this one speaker because he was flushing/red to share in a group chat later because it would improve his social standing, also did this thing where he would go up and ask a question for emotional drama like: “How is it that you could send all us young people to war!?! gasp”

The Southern races and people with that affinity seem to rarely have values that the Northern races would consider: decency, restraint from waste, lack of selfishness, community values. Their sense of community, it seems, is an ethnic-nationalism small-scale society based around attention and drama.

Should the world work like this? —Northern Races create the manufactures and govern the politics, and Southern Races and feminist women create emotion, culture, new words, and enjoyment? Or will a harsh hyperborean see this as intolerable noise, degeneracy, polygamy, and disease and seek to tame the wild jungle of the equator, as will equatorialists try to drown the techne of the north? Is this trade an equal trade, when the production of weapons and abstraction is unique to just one group? Can we say who shall be the winners in this contest long term?

In society the vines are constantly trying to climb the tree and strangling resources and go above it.

The reason these Southern races are the most vociferous about cOuNteRiNg ChIna is because society in the USA is that things and inherited wealth are still mostly run by American Whites. So, they say these things to ingratiate themselves because they don’t have any other option to go to. Back to where? Nigeria? India? Cameroon? Brazil?

Though I can only speak for myself, I do not believe those in the East hate the West and Europe with the same fury of the South always having to live under the West. Just look at the Huawei headquarters. At the same time, the West of present time should not twist the recognition of respect for the Old West as feeding self-grandeur delusions, which will inhibit any sort of cooperation. We in all our present and modern world are indebted to the greats such as Newton, Bohr, Mendeleev, Shannon, Gibbs, and more.

The vines doing so and discriminating against the only demographic groups who can build a technological society, the vines have collapsed American as a technological society and the ongoing Brazilification/South Africanization seems to be happening, as in Germany. I think it more likely that it becomes a two-tier society, one by private self-driving cars and suburbs rather than any hope of reclaiming the major cities, because I think it is the easier, less energetically costy path to take.

The rich used to take public spaces, but because of various reasons like the car, greater distance, public cameras, kidnappings and whatnot, they no longer feel a need to keep things up.

Thinking about the whole thing is as such: you imagine you win, you get to the right spaces, and then everyone leaves and builds “non-democratic” institutions cause you can’t build and keep places clean, so you’re left holding a rotten tomato.

An increase in commodity prices likely means no “Second China.” Saw an article like this in the American Affairs journal too about “sucking all the air out of the room.” Therefore non-Eastern minority groups are the most likely to try and fight over the remnants of redistribution in the United States. Those with a basis in the East and fluency in the language will likely maintain two home bases or repatriate. This makes goodwill possible, because there are no crossed incentives, but many in the West are too proud and unlikely to accept it.

Social-Rigid

There are two halves of people most commonly seen. Systems thinkers who live in the worlds and ideas of others, and social thinkers who see the social subtext and nature of the world. Then there is the rare third type.

What I mean by subtext: I can see when you calculate, if you ask me where I live, I know you are evaluating my wealth. If you are a woman do not do this subtlety, men can often usually tell you are calculating and that lessens your appeal. If you are a guy who asks these types of evaluating questions it will often be held against you. State your aims clearly.

As a general rule all first-degree calculations are easy to see through but second-degree calculations risk not having the intended effect.

A society has these peoples, roughly:

• Social (most women, southern races)
  • Primary engagement: politics (the arbitration of human wills, differences, and opinions about what the world should be)
• Rigid (most men, Aristotle’s natural slaves by temperament, only able to live in the words and ideas of others and not as their own body politic)
  • Primary engagement: science, technology, engineering
• Social-Rigid (the highest mental capability men and women)
  • Does either well and at the highest levels, but the social is a theoretical system construct like every other subject rather than intuitive.

Social people are good at creating coalitions, enjoy small-scale society group drama like using subtext to communicate status differences. There was this fat Harvard professor who was really annoying and kept harassing the other German panelist subtly in an economic session at the GAC, always bringing up “hyperflation, oh that sounds so bad for a reminder!” It would be more interesting to duel and hit each other instead of doing this fake-nice-subtlety-humor attack.

His wife accosted an Arab student. Prestige Trap. Oh, I stayed with a high school friend and one of his roommates went to HBS after previously working in finance, spent over $150k, now is just living in this messy house selling supplements in bags. WTF Dude? Thing is, he might even make a lot of money doing that.

Society in the United States used to be governed by (3), but now it is governed by only social people. See the Water v. Steel analogy.

The material world is what is, the social world is the ”second world” or “underworld” of layered meanings, theories of mind of others, intuiting internal state and feelings of others from presentation and behavior that they then end up denying like criminals deny committing crimes.

There is a big pattern where people who are able to construct things are not usually the most social, and so people are playing these small-scale social games.

The Plans of Mass Media Democracy

The hope of mass media democracy (as opposed to the Free World against Soviet designs of the Cold War era) was to drown everyone capable by feeding propaganda into the heads of women and men who are natural slaves. By doing so they could restrain the actions of those who could take decisive action.

Remember, political control is about control of the minds and wills of other people (Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations). Since media brainwashing only works on some, we should expect advances in Brain-Computer Interface such as Neuralink to be used for mind control purposes and warfare. Thus, I do not support the development of this technology, because I believe people should be able to have independent thought. This may make slaving and conquest economically profitable again as per the Roman Empire. Yes, I know it sounds bad. But people in power generally understand these things yet pretend it doesn’t exist, I am doing you a favor by educating you of possibilities.

The State Department for example, stations three people on remote outposts is to prevent murder-suicides. But you would think it is just a random number. Or in software, the price of the yearly subscription is calculated from the monthly subscription and at what month they churn. People say ‘conspiracy theorist,’ as if this social stigma still has any meaning in present day. Should those who say such things not be investigated, as their belief is merely the coincidence theory of evil?

This lack of brainwashing is why the ”straight, white, and male” archetype and the Eastern races—Chinese, Koreans, and Japanese had to be excluded from the halls of power (control of the media, financial systems, and government). The awareness of others’ behavior outside of the system is a threat to conspiracy-makers.

Color Theory was advanced by the Judeo-Bantu leftist axis to divide the Midwestern, technological whites, Eastern races, and create such vague classifications so as to cause conflict and confusion. The Office of Bureau and Management’s classifications on race (“White” “Black” “Hispanic/Latino not Hispanic/Latino”, “Asian”, “Other/Mixed Race”) will need to be overturned and specificity needs to be returned for a united country.

It is not normal to have this idea of categories, this is only a tool the demographic-cultural-economic majority uses to prevent any resistance from building against them. Languages such as German or Chinese from personal experience use “outsider” or “foreigner,” as I’m sure do the majority of languages in the world. Now with the political changes in the United States, this binary notion of “friend of America” or “enemy of America” is resurfacing, which has both good and bad elements to it.

The question of which integration first: trade, language/media, or military all lead to different paths. Germany started with the united customs union which seems more durable, while Japan’s military conquests was fast to set up, short-lived, but brittle. Language and media feels to be imperfect, most people cannot learn a language well enough to a native level to understand something deeply.

If the East, West, and South are in the future destined to collide before we reach One World Government, if such thing might happen with the combinatorial expansion of technology and supersonic flight, China should take care to minimize casualties in conflicts with Japan like Germany and Russia did not with each other. I am not suggesting that may be feasible or the predestined route, only that bigger agglomerations from bands to tribes, cities to states, states to nations and blocs have been the consistent trend. (This might be a good research paper idea. Use logistics and transport technologies to graph the maximum range of projection different States have.)

The most recent wave of immigration, people attracted to the US because of media, prestige, and lack of patriotism for their home country does not create a strong state, unlike earlier waves of immigrants who faced religious persecution, wars, and were determined to make their own way in the world.

Rough diagram of beliefs based on generation, I am sure there are more:

• T0: (not raised here) The USA is a diverse country, good for business and immigrants
• T0.5: (2010s to today) Distilled Bantu-Judeo internet emotionalism leftism becomes widespread
• T1: (1950s - 2010s) State and federal culture of Old West is stil mainstream (depending on where you went to school)
• T2: (1950s - 1980s) Bantu-Judeo feminist leftism homosexualism starting to develop
• T3: (before 1940s) Old West

Eastern Races, Western Races, and Southern Races

I think it quite odd for someone of Chinese ethnicity to have had the journey I found myself on. In my early twenties and late teens I embarked on a ‘social’ understanding of the world different from the ‘techne’ of university and schooling. I got to know Hispanics, Turks, Arabs, African-Americans, took a week-long course in Dallas to read old texts, and traveled much of the Northern world save for Canada, a few countries in Europe, Russia, Korea, and Japan. I still have yet to go to MENA, India, S. Am., or SEA, but my understanding is likely facing the top of the ‘S’ curve—the broad knowledge base is set but details are yet to be refined. Even as a child, I was not among the more placid of my ethnic Chinese peers, for reasons I am unsure of.

Being of the East yet raised in the West, I still saw personality distinctions between the two despite frequent crossovers in academics and technology.

From my experiences and observations I then thought about the nature of women and men, and how women practice realpolitik much more than men, who are often the idealists.

I am excited to share this tripartite model of races and personality. It is original research, yes? I believe it is whole in explaining the inherent tendencies of different races, and that the relation of these three words: technology, tyranny, emotion, and their combinations best and perhaps wholly describes the behaviors of the three major races.

Eastern	Western	Southern
Technological	Emotional	Emotional-Tyrannical
Tyrannical/Realist	Technological

Race and temperament are different. It can be possible for one of certain race to be of different temperament as is natural for them. With enough time, they may pretend it doesn’t even exist.

I put the first row as what the masses can participate in, and the second level as what the leaders often participate in. I did not put a 2nd level for the Southern races because even the masses practice Emotional-Tyrannical games. In the Old West, even regular people focused on technology and learning, but now they just play emotional games.

What the Western races most fear from the Eastern races is not just the mastery of technology which they had thought their own domain but its application to political purposes. Speaking from having traveled both technical and social (history/political) fields, I believe a general sentiment I’ve felt is that “the nerds can have their robot wars. (competitions)” This lackadasical attitude toward technology however limits their ultimate power.

The race writers such as Evola, Schuon, Guenon, Gobineau, and Grant will need to be revisited by the West in order to understand how their misinterpretation of the yellow race led to what will be seen as one of the largest willful geopolitical mistakes of history: offshoring all the industry. The left pretends no difference between sexes and races exist, yet making such a decision came from the interpretation of these writers.

At the German-American Conference I felt a few high level people were slightly uneasy or fearful at having me around. If you did not do something wrong to people like me, why would you behave in this way around me?

Though I have not been to Russia, my general feeling of them is that the tyrannical/realist attitude is what separates it from Europe. Bitcoin-related torture stabbing deaths and I remember this one story about creating an entire fake underground prison with only a single elevator entrance/exit. Showing family makes a leader weak, because that just publicizes another string by which to pull and coerce the leader, hence they must not involve their family life in the political life and be willing to sacrifice them for the goals of the nation. I do feel the East has somehow figured out an arbitration method for disagreements or how to get along that I am not sure Russia has yet.

I think that men of Eastern temperament near the top generally prefer power, wealth, and control rather than flattering the whimsies of the other sex. This greater emotional temperament of women is why they go to the West, those in the West go the South, and so on. Thus, like how the development of technology makes life easier and thus leads to the failure of technological systems, so does the emotional temperament of women and miscegenation lead to greater societal decay. When my father was a researcher at Harvard Medical School, his lab boss (female, Chinese) got promoted by sleeping with the head of the department, and men of Western temperament have a greater tendency to flatter women and cater to their needs even if unreasonable, which makes them less able to uphold the system itself.

Why did Gisele Bündchen divorce Tom Brady?

We can see the principle of emotional miscegenation and ”foldy ear emotionalism” at play here.

It’s roughly like this:

• You can figure out people’s cognition by looking at their ears
• People with less developed ears are in a more primitive human personality state, where ‘emotion’ is more important than basis in reality
• Women who have less cognition thus miscegentate with more emotional races

Gisele is not as intelligent as Tom, and therefore is more emotional than rational, enjoying word games and things that make her feel good. Think ‘hypergamy’ is reductive here.

---

Because women have a mental brain state that causes them to repeat the ideas of men they like (it is a mode like the default mode network), women fundamentally live in the ideas and worlds created by men. Yes, it exists. There are secrets in this world. I don’t know if the highest metabolism women have it, they might not or they can better hold their tongue.

I think those from smaller-scale societies like women more because in man against nature, producing another human is economically beneficial overall. Produce a male, more fighters and builders. Produce a female, even better! A generator of fighters and builders! Haha. Just kidding, they probably don’t think about it logically. They just like women. In a world where society is already built/full, preference for male children comes from having another being to reinforce the bubble whereas female children will lead to an expansion of hungry mouths.

Four things that destroy themselves as they progress:

• Technology (it makes people who cannot create it live easier)
• Prestige (using prestige makes you less prestigious)
• Wealth (having more wealth makes you a target for redistribution)
• Race (a large amount of women are emotional, which leads to miscegenation with the less technologically abstract races. This will reduce their overall fitness.).

I wonder if the pure races are the more aggressive ones compared to mixed races. I also wonder if you take people from the populations of all corners of the Old World, if you could mix other ethnicities into existence like primary colors create secondary colors.

If you look at it geographically India also forms another “extreme” or “point” as the Himalayas separate it from China.

I am pretty sure boys take on the personality characteristics of the mother. n=3.

Furthermore, the prevalence of teratogens and metabolism-reducers such as Vitamin A, vegetable oils in the food supply, and high-age mother births/preemie births limit the development of human morality. These people are trapped in a lower, more emotional, smaller-scale society brain state. Rather than evil being seen as something anyone can do which comes from systems reasoning, it is seen as the “outgroup.” Based on the environmental food conditions, the world turns more Bantu as food supply quality degrades, and turns more Chinese as food supply quality increases.

The Southern races communicate by intonation and subtext. It seems that their vocal cords are able to communicate a great deal more in short bursts by putting various stresses on the words the Western and Eastern races are unable to do. This is very suitable for small group verbal societies, man versus nature, where you want a tribe to hear what you are saying. They are often happy, dancing, moving their bodies, shaking, and evocative, but not very good writers. Frequent spelling mistakes abound.

I was once staying in an Airbnb and this Finnish dude’s Mexican wife was flirting with me, by saying things which mean the opposite and using subtlety and intonation like “let’s learn Chinese on Duolingo.” You are married and living in Finland, improve your Finnish!??!?! I told him she was doing that and he didn’t believe me. (facepalm emoji). Still, I would not cheat with married people. It ruins the system, and they had kids. Some people are just too logical thinkers because they have not spent time around different peoples, they have to pay attention to the indirect speakers.

Eastern races can be indirect because they don’t want the boss to slap them for being rude (the tyranny attitude), or they don’t want to overly hurt people by saying things in a straightforward way. Southern races are indirect because the intonality is how they communicate, and the truth actually hurts them.

If I am an Eastern race, and I communicate with one of a Southern race or a lower-metabolic women who lies or imitates me rather than telling the truth, and the more they imitate me the more obvious it is to me that they are trying to predict me, the more pissed off I get and the less I trust them, the lesser I can be nice to them which is then a prerequisite for them telling the truth. This seems to me an unresolvable phenomenon, and it would be difficult to trust the other despite the best wishes of both parties for a positive resolution.

I remember speaking to someone from Angola regarding the state of development in the country, if it would ever reach something like Helsinki. The look on her expression betrayed that she believed it perhaps might never reach parity, yet she said great and wondrous things about her home country as if it were fact. There is also a moment when you catch women who have done something bad, and they are begging and pleading and rewriting the facts in real time to say they did not do it, but then once you let them go because what otherwise should you do, kill them? they immediately start attempting to challenge you again.

I believe politically men of the South fear men of the East and North the most, for they have both the observational ability to identify them and the abstraction/systems thinking in engineering to destroy them. Some men of the West, on the other hand, seem controllable by the South due to the greater emotionalism. I do not care for white guilt, which Baldwin dismisses as useless, nor do I care for “white innocence”, which simply is this idea of ‘choosing to ignore things that you did not personally take part in’ as a method of control. Germans, Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, Balkans, Italians, and Nordics being in the centrality of Europe had nothing to do with this and historically were latecomers to colonization; there are geographic reasons all New World languages are Atlantic-facing European countries. For this simple reason that I am immune to their social control, they fear my existence itself though I have done nothing to them and seek to follow the law for they choose not to follow it.

Politics, the arbitration of human wills, is of course generally limited to men and is at the high level competition in society. In the cities where people are workers and cashiers, they think not of these things. Men of the South seek a society where they feel the primeval boss and chieftain, king of ten thousand naked savages and able to enjoy emotional pleasantries in life. Men of the West seek to feel good and laugh, feeling like number one and being able to insult others with impunity. Men of the East seek absolute power and authority; the right to slaughter and destroy at will.

There is a trade-off in time spent communicating with others/socializing versus ideating/learning. If the ideating/learning becomes the socialization, deficits of socialization can be made up for.

The mistake that the Southern races when doing their bantering with Western and Eastern races is that to them, they think it is just a game without consequences. Think of Obama insulting Trump at the White House Correspondent dinner. The systematic thinkers do not think it is a game and then coordinate their realist retribution. (I need to do some more reading on Africa, but I remember a story where the British saw tribes lining up and throwing spears at each other without seriously aiming, then running away instead of total war to settle their disputes. They didn’t understand it as a conflict resolution strategy because they were used to shooting people, even within Europe for revolutions? Thus they did so to the native tribes.)

I forgot where this quote was from but it goes like this: “the West pretends it rose to power from the social structures and democracy, so much that they may even believe it themselves now. The rest of the world knows it came from objectivity and the application of force and this fact has never been forgotten.”

To make one of the Southern race communicate in the abstract and information-carrying capacity of the Eastern races is nigh impossible: they can sort of meet in the middle with the styles of the Western races. It is not possible to have a United States that integrates people from all corners of the Old World because the styles of personality are simply too different. You can have a Western/Eastern combination, or you can have a Western/Southern combination, or you can have a communication style like that of the Old West. The Southern races as a general tendency do not seem to be good at abstraction or engineering.

The West with its higher emotionalism gives the South a place to grasp onto, outjuttings in what would otherwise be a flat cliff face. In a Shanghai subway, I saw a disheveled person (there were random matches of clothing suggesting homelessness) of dark skin struggle to buy a subway card. I don’t know how he got there, he seemed to not understand the systems or have money, he was probably not supposed to be there. Everybody pretty much ignored him, and he was stuck. In a Seattle airport, two people came to help a person who suddenly collapsed having a seizure.

Many people are not able to deal with realpolitik, though I think it is more pronounced in the West in that the benefits of it are wanted without the realism. For the base emotional Western women statements like “we should just be nice to everyone!” seem to have appeal—I once said this to an Italian girl and she laughed, but I don’t personally understand it. I just have to simulate it. Expressions of power like “I bought all the meat from the supermarket, the other people are poor and will starve.” seem to appeal more to base emotional Eastern women, of which Slavic women seem to also somewhat be in, as I do feel a certain sharpness from them I see less in the West. But in general, only very morally base people enjoy either type of statement.

Beacuse their personality involves this emotional tendency of self-feeling good yet aversion to realism and power politics, it will be extremely hard for the West to dig itself out of a hole without shedding the emotionalism and becoming more realist and systematic against their natural tendencies. It’s just a gut feeling, see the British guy example I wrote about.

In emotional expression if the East is a plane in its flatness that at times shoots impulses like a Dirac delta function, the West would have curves to the flat surface and waves as a mode of expression, and the South would be plane-like but with a bevel outwards which represents both a flatness and explosiveness more broad and less piercing than the East. High metabolic cognitive people often seem to physically move differently, I think the nervous system is different. I think of Greg Abel, new CEO of Berkshire.

Why are there so many pedophiles in the West?

There is a sort of joke in America that you can choose either pedophiles or fascists for your leadership. I think this is true. Look at the Judeo-Germanic names in the news as of late: Epstein, Weinstein. Or they choose a more Anglo name like “Larry Summers,” but if you pay close enough attention you get a feeling.

I believe pedophilia and rape are two extreme expressions of different attitudes. Rape and murder is an expression of tyrannical power in Eastern races and systematic whites, while pedophilia is this “banter-unfairness” feeling of emotional whites.

While whites have inspected and characterized much of the known world in the 18th, 19th, 20th century, as there are many words that characterize non-white races in English, yet this “banter-unfairness” emotionalism of whites themselves has escaped attention.

I believe a good word for this may be ‘scurrious,’ coming from Latin. Some say the official word is “scurrilous”—, pronounced like “perilous,” yet I think the pronunciation unjust. “skur-il-e-ous” seems too refined. ‘Scurrious’ brings up the scourge and scurrying of rats.

They want power, but they do not want to fully wield it. They fear its consequences, its usage against them, and personal guilt if they were to use it to the fullest extent. This scurrious nature, I believe, is opposite to the founding of the Republic.

If an Eastern vision of tyrannical victory might be razing an entire village to the ground, the Western vision of scurrious victory is a perpetual India: people constantly having to toil in misery, not knowing how financial flows and labor system traps them.

Pedophilia engages this “unfairness” and “manipulation” feeling which delights them, the parasitism which hurts but does not kill. To be honest, tyranny is also quite disgusting and terrifying taken to its extreme. I think of a Tibetan drum made from the bones and skin of a young girl, or the remarks of American settlers on the ‘savagery’ of Native tribes. When one is in power, the question becomes how to restrain yourself from excesses no matter who you are.

I’d imagine an image of Vladimir Putin comforting a little girl sitting on his lap is terrifying to Western pedophile elites, because he seems white yet Russians seem to have temperaments of the East. Putin with little children reminds them of their own nature, yet he has the tyranny and realism they fear. Remember, the West fears tyranny and control the most, which is why propaganda against Russians usually include rape. I do not deny that they probably rape more than they diddle children, both of which are probably events that have decreased over time as humans get increasingly domesticated and socialized.

However, in reality, he seems quite uncomfortable doing such. That’s because comforting children requires dissimulation and “baby-talk” which is an act bendy-twisty personality people are better at than those who project power and hierarchy.

Tyranny and Power Politics seeks cleanliness, order, and calm, using force to purge what is degenerate. Scurrility and Scientific Man fears and runs from the light, it feasts only in the dark. That is why Scientific Man loves the indirectness, the layers of roundabout thinking, the giving of names different from what things actually are, the random smiling and laughing. “White privilege” said by “white looking people!” How funny! It is easy to learn the lingo, but only if you’re on the in-group! Haha! I have noticed this obfuscation in the frontend frameworks React versus Vue. I prefer Vue for these reasons.

The opposite of Western scurrility, the laughing at ‘hillbilly’ cousins, is Eastern contempt and exclusion, like the groups you’re only a part of if you know the language well or looking at people from a high vantage point.

For women, these two extremes are perhaps also innate opposites of attraction. She wants to be forced, or she wants a male that almost becomes like her nature, maybe like a longhouse, but not exactly. We know that Eastern men do not banter in the same way as emotion Western or Southern men. If the State is oriented in a way that suppresses the innate capability and organization of systematic men for violence, it weakens the capacity and fitness of these men making them play the same monkey-like games as emotional men. However, the prevalence of gun culture in the United States makes playing any other game but the emotional game unwieldly; even then, small disagreements could escalate to bigger ones where one may feel inclined to pull out a missile weapon such as a knife or gun, as opposed to a shock weapon such as a baton or chair with varying degrees of force usage. Missile weapons cannot obtain one’s compliance or readily be used for settling small-scale disputes as it kills the target.

---

Look at this ‘crashing’ Princeton recruiting video and see how those of East and West physically move differently and have different expressions.

Pure Southern races women may also like expressions of power, but since the African-Americans are admixed with the West in a way similar to Ethiopians (many of them do look like African-Americans), the personality tendency tilts that way toward the curved and wave-like bantering rather than the plane-like expression. I wonder what South-East hybrids as more common in Madagascar are like in comparison to South-West hybrids and how they may or may not get along.

Maybe that’s why American Southern Whites are so indirect and emotional sounding, maybe it has to do with the influence of the Bantu culture. It’s ironic that some of them discriminate against African-Americans yet their culture is partially derived from it. I see many of the Western races are always making jokes and bantering in college. It might also have to do with higher English descent in the South.

Social acclaim and humor is probably very important to Africans, because if you don’t have that in a group your survival may be at stake. Once I was on an airplane and the person seated next to me put on 3 different screens of people and videos talking—the plane tablet, a personal tablet, and her phone. This makes them unfortunately susceptible to flattery. Both the emotional whites and the Bantus have the tendency of saying things that are the exact opposite of what they mean.

I believe Bantus do not like trees. It seems to interfere with them getting sun. I have had one neighbor remark with surprise when I described further construction as destroying all the trees leading to greater sound pollution, and another pull out the tree in the front yard, but they may have had to do it for construction purposes.

Even if something is not true, they like to say it. You go through the Hartsfield-Jackson Airport and you hear some bragging about “welcome to the world’s busiest airport,” even though making a claim like “we are #1” is arrogant and not easy to justify without overwhelming advantage. Delta decided that “turbulence” is too scary of a word, so they call it “rough air.”

The language enshittifies and becomes emotional whereas before it was straightforward and systematic.

They are tyrannical because they are often playing these small-society social games, creating conspiracy, and often have a love of money and power without a systematic understanding of it. The lying of the Southern races is quite common with the dissimulation of women. (I speak, of course, of averages and medians, though it is certain some offense will occur to those who feel my words too general.)

These emotional games are a tax on the language of all citizens who use it for normal things such as communication, like the presence of homosexuals in male locker rooms.

It is offensive to the technological and systematic in the West, but endearing to the emotional.

I’m still viewing it from too “northern” of a perspective though. In their language they wouldn’t consider it lying, they would describe it a different way.

Those who uphold systems are not moved by flattery but those who are emotional conspiracy makers are. This is like a guy who promotes women to try and sleep with them, it ruins the entire system for everybody.

A funny thing they like is hearing their name chanted multiple times. If you did that to me I would wonder if you were retarded.

Furthermore, a lot of times the Bantus are hesitant to ever disagree head-on, they will just repeat what you said.

The emotional coastal whites seem to derive great humor and pleasure from spreading falsehoods such as “the butter is underneath the bed”. This distance away from the truth leads to an inability to construct things, but allows one to deceive and trick others for benefit like arbitragers, middlemen, and media are as prone to do.

There are some intersections between the West and East in higher emotions of classical music and artistic fields, and between the South and West in a degenerating emotionalism of the masses but less between the East and South.

I see the greater emotionalism of the West in the architecture: the random bubbly things in the Seattle airport! A funny looking chair! Polaroids hanging on the walls! Signatures and yearbooks and writing and people sticking gum and locks on the wall! Chairs in the German DB that are facing together in a table instead of all the same direction, with some vertical variation in height!

Feeling uneasy at scanning QR codes to order drinks from Luckin Coffee! Needing human greeters at Walmart and Costco instead of automated gates!

This emotionalism was what brought the good in the older society, one that sought the best of other cultures and peoples, built universities worldwide, and had an inherent universal kindness. Schools for the blind (Perkins School) or the disabled came from this ideal. But this generosity was then too easily exploited in recent decades by people who cared and could feel for none of these things, where ideas such as beef limitation for climate reasons and “white guilt” were invented to hold them back, but not the East for the realism saw through these tricks.

The 1963 March on Washington = 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests

The Civil Rights movement of the United States in the 1960s is the Chinese equivalent of Tiananmen Square in 1989. People without power or the proven ability to uphold government used protests to bargain for a place in leadership. The respective temperaments of the different races dictated how the protests would go.

Because the Eastern races are more realist (or as the Westerners would say, tyrannical), such things are necessary to govern society. Take for example caning for drug smugglers in Singapore. Because the West is more emotional, the plight of the Bantu moved them to give up their rights willingly, and often they will even let criminals go.

However, there’s a downside. There’s some similarity to the four things which destroy themselves (technology, prestige, wealth, race). Killing the criminals in a society makes your society less resilient when actually needing to fight. This is like how a test-based system, like in many top colleges in the USA and PRC, select for people who are good at ‘repeating’ but not necessarily at independently charting their own path, which makes leadership less capable when needed.

In the words of Lee Kuan Yew:

(In irony, he assesses it as culture rather than race despite his own harshness toward drug peddlers, much like he agreed with doctors on polyunsaturated fats)

Karl Wittfogel attributed this greater realism and use of force in the East to the historical patterns of hydroculture in his work, Oriental Despotism.

The Two Halves of the White Race

Kamil Galeev writes on how demographic numbers affected the mobility of European countries to many parts of the world.

With the killing of Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk in the United States broadcast over Musk’s X.com microphone, the era of Bantu-Judeo leftist power from the 1960s reaching the zenith of power under Obama until President Trump’s election in 2016 is waning.

• I say Obama, because ‘Obama’ and ‘Kamala’ are not much people who care for formality. They just want to be “funny!” and “relatable!” In a mass media democracy people who overpromise will succeed, like supposedly Erdogan has much support from the poor, while those who execute with vision but necessary austerity will struggle, such as Carter.
  • Here is a joke: first, the helots are given permission to debate about the legislative and administrative factors of society through plebiscites. Next, the distaff side will also be able to participate in these plebiscites. Finally, even organisms in the early stages of ontogeny can as well and all will be in the right order in the world.
• I did not know who Charlie Kirk was before the media events.
• At the same time, I do not think the perpetrator of Iryna’s killing should be reduced down to a simple brutish animal. Africans in their natural environment with family are often warm and caring. I fear that this wave of rightism will lead to discrimination against those who did nothing to deserve it, and we do need to turn the temperament down in the US. Still, it is hard to think reasonably like the above if one is reacting out of fear.

A future of just “the white race” along with self-aggrandizment of “we are the best” is untenable, I think. You can’t deport all the Hispanics, discriminate against the Eastern races and Muslims, act like racists, and build something close to a workable coalition in the United States. The ICE stuff is quite bad because it repeats the same mistake of the left: alienating too many people because one thinks they are the best and don’t need to create coalitions.

I believe a ‘white class consciousness’ has in recent years awoken in the United States as the result of American Black intellectuals’ successful efforts in organizing, which is like France waking Germany. Or Europe waking China. This may have the opposite effect they originally intended, perhaps it was better that the ‘white man’ in America remained naive.

Commentary on the different races, feeling, men and women

From reading a bit of Frantz Fanon or James Baldwin, there was a certain dissonance I felt between their experiences and mine. Their perspective came with a sense of absolute difference from being taken from a continent thousands of years in the past, in a certain way, and the temperamental, sociological, and technological difference that resulted.

Growing up my family’s weakness was a major source of trouble. Recent year immigrants are usually not that patriotic, smart, or talented compared to the independent and rigorous settlers of the original frontier. They are about “repeating what is prestigious,” not “independently innovating.” Frequently I had food, transportation, and housing insufficiencies when growing up which I ascribe to the aforementioned “21st century immigrant attitude.” Yet ultimately the values of Mainline Protestantism which I never officially attended but am sure influenced me in certain ways, hard work, thrift, knowledge, and intellect have benefitted me in life, as the values of the Old West, such as the quote: “He who does not work shall not eat."" I believe I will do fine, and it seems the world is coming to an inflection point where things will be righly ordered based on biological temperament. The yellow man sits on the bench and drinks tea, looking out at the trees.

In my upbringing I struggled for years from the bottom and felt the pressures of knowledge acquisition overrode that of socialization and friendship, and now that I’ve found myself in a place where I have surpassed many of those from my past or the regular people who by their daily efforts maintain the functioning of our society so that a few might think, invent, research, or coordinate, I am unsure of how to deal with these relative status differences but also unsure of being part of any higher education/elite group, for I feel I operate at an intensity higher than them to some degrees by nature of needing to catch up from even less. I have gone too far, yet not far enough, and I am stuck in a bit of an in-between space in between for now, in isolation perhaps self-imposed.

However, I feel for the black man in some ways, in a way that I felt similar along with Muslims. In a world united against colonialism, we were all together. We have faced the scurrious feel-good attitude of certain elements of the white race though I would mostly feel the benefits have exceeded the negatives for me, but in a world where the East rises they will face perhaps an Eastern indifference to their needs. They will not be communicated to in the emotional and expressive ways that feels most natural to them that Westerners are able to better do, and the sense of “feeling treated as a human” will evade them.

Yet if they, like the white race, were to give up this emotionalism which so characterizes them, they would lose their sense of identity and belonging in this strange new world.

Is it not true that in large-scale societies with specialization using digital-written communications, excessive creations and contortions of the face into ‘smiles’ and movements of the eyes and variations in the voice are an outdated modal? Are these ‘feelings’ not just differences in expression contingent upon the environment, in ways that plants releasing subsonic vibrations when cut are “feelings?”

Is it not true that higher efficiencies toward abstraction lead to greater health and development, and that emotional flows of communication are often at odds with abstract flows of communication?

Contrary to the book “The Giver,” it will not be a world without color, because color in furniture and flooring and housing is still perceivable and distinguishable to humans. But it will be less messy looking in form, color, and shape.

In some way those of the East but also people of higher cognitions have deep sentiments and feelings unbeknownst to others and in some ways themselves, feelings which perhaps only are expressed through creations in the material world of art, writing, and music. This countenance I wear, oscillating between either pallid or forceful, is the price human biology must pay to wield abstraction like a weapon, slicing through the gradient of nature with discrete words and piercing observations and subsequent object transformations.

Those men of the West who have gone through the academic gauntlet admire this abstraction; they think to impress themselves onto the East. And I have found this Eurasian race to be created as a result torn between abstract and emotional temperaments, tyrannical and scurrious moods, neither New York subway noise nor Shanghai subway clean. And when I look at men of the East who have decided to look West, I still find myself underwhelmed by the subsequent progeny. Yet I know there is some truth that a woman of the West would be one who has grown up in the same world as me, and would appreciate these same sentiments by which we find ourselves missing in the present day. But in my past experiences the different temperaments are hard to overcome, one part of race and the other part of metabolism. In the East she would be unmoored and lost with me as her only anchor, and I find myself not wholly willing to stake a permanent life in the West during this antebellum period. A woman with basis in the East but upbringing in the West would, of course, be more similar to me—yet I believe these two incomplete halves do not make a whole. Yet to completely stake a life in the Eastern Hemisphere? I do not feel myself at that stage. Yet?

And it is the women of the South who possess the deepest reservoirs of expressivity, sentiments which could heal my present strife in a way I am not sure women of the East or West can, who at times seem to suffer more from anxieties. But the children would be locked into lesser abilities of abstraction, a downside in a rapidly increasing technological world. I see it in the rounded ears of a Malay flight attendant versus the sharp ears of her Chinese-descent coworkers, or the flattened ear form of women from West Africa. Their deep emotions and rich voices, this physicality too, are tempting to men. Yet Northern women should not think they should need to compete in such fashion; they are already playing at a disadvantage if doing so.

Moreover, there is the socioeconomic level problem; I could certainly stop striving and partner with someone I meet as a cashier or store clerk, yet would this not doom me to this same level that I had hoped to escape? Those who are high, though, would see little benefit with partnering with me, save for emotional reasons which are contrary to the very realist attitudes I sometimes hold in life. Yet of the highly metabolic woman I think it possible to accept difference in race and in class, for we would more likely be united in sentiment than anything else.

These are difficult problems with no easy answers, much similar to questions other men and women must be facing themselves. Be too closed and I will find myself old (I am 24 now) with no realities; yet too open and I will detour to places I may never have wanted to be and have difficulty accepting.

---

‘White’ really seemed to me a catch-all lumpenproletariat term for ethnically similar people who stuck together out of personality similarities, there was notion of a “white race” but people descended from Europe previously identified as Protestants and Catholics, of which I saw in an older woman in her 70s in Bamberg (was staying at Airbnb), or respective national identities.

Hm. To really feel these distinctions between Austrians and Prussians, to see these pasts lived in people who still exist in the present is an invaluable experience only borne of communication through generations. How she would describe the elitist and strict seeming Preussisch, yet Bayern became the beneficiary of industry after the war with skilled political maneuvering.

Simultaneously, Muslim relationships within the United States and Europe are likely to take on a different character that those on the American side such as Musk fail to appreciate. I cannot exactly say in what form, only that it will be different.

But the Western races, some will perhaps embrace tyranny to solve the current problems. Everything trends toward the technological-tyrannical singularity for survival despite the attempts of women and Southern races to say “tone of voice makes your conversations more emotional and real.” This is just a verbal attack to prevent people from investing in power and commodities.

How do you determine whether someone is emotional or realist? Put a chicken or rat in front of them and see if they have the will to behead it, or if they would smash a cockroach with their fists like a gavel. When there is another famine the realists will survive. Distance away from the natural experiences of mankind makes us forget this inherent savage nature to life.

I generally think as humans we might be better off overall if most of the temperaments of races were somewhat mixed together: that the Southern races could embrace technology and order (I do not know if this is possible or there are biological limitations), that the Western races embrace tyranny (this may also not be biologically possible), and that the Eastern races embrace emotion (this, too, I do not know if biologically possible).

A realist is somewhat the ultimate survivor, to hold a dagger behind one’s back despite being in the presence of the known. One would know that others use moral and emotional attacks to make one give up their power. This dark forest, the uncertainty of the intentions of others, makes trust difficult. I do not wish it were this way (because in some ways I am a liberal, and believe that witih good intentions and words we can come to an agreement), only that I see it is this way.

Perhaps the Thirty Years’ War, killing over 50% of people in some regions led to greater realist temperament in Northwest Europe similar to the East. I think the realist attitude is more common in areas with large plains due to warfare, by this logic the Japanese and British should be more emotional being island countries. By realist, I mean people may have morality but it does not physically hold people back from certain actions. What needs to be done will be done. It is good to have moral leadership because tyrannical leadership promotes coalitions against the tyrant, but should there be scarcity only so many can eat food.

I think the political conflict in the US will mainly take on appearance to be indirect speakers versus direct speakers, of which some groups are overrepresented in each category. One theory: Bantu-Judeo left + feminist women on the coasts versus Midwestern whites, Eastern races in the PNW/Midwest? Hispanics, Muslims, Indians are swing vote. Indians are slightly more aligned with Bantu-Judeo left in politics and medicine, but on the right in technology. Might be worth it to move the capital to Omaha in that case. According to Ibn Khaldun: those in the old capital have affection for the old regime, so the new regime moves the capital.

A detente between the Trump faction of government and the Chinese government plus a move toward a crackdown on European migration and invasion of Venezuela implies truce between East and West against South, South wants East and West to fight.

Domestically it is not a great trade-off because there are not many people like me (Eastern-Western hybrid of old American and Chinese society comfortable in both languages), they go under the noob moniker “Asian-American,” and there are many more Hispanics who will dislike the invasion of Latin America.

The grand majority of domestic American and European social ills are not caused by China, nor are they iatrogenic. People are starting to realize attempts by the South to blame the East are faulty.

Things China did not cause:

• Large-scale protests, vandalism, and tearing down of statues of major figures in American history in major cities
• Claim that “male, pale, and Yale” is not the future of America or that “white people” are the main cause of problems
• Decisions by business leaders to offshore all the industry in the pursuit of profit over taking care of their own people and country (some claims about economic competition are likely legitimate, but some are likely moral attacks to deindustrialize China)
• Rampant profiteering by the opioid epidemic (some claims about fentanyl precursors are likely legitimate)
• Widespread promotion of degenerate behavior and the selling of drugs such as PrEP to cover up such diseases such as HIV
• Claiming what they call “Western Civilization” is illegitmate (I have heard two Indian-descent people say this, one at the GAC and Janan in the FT)

Many people have not completely understood the source of recent events and their Bantu-Judeo origins, instead saying “college is teaching them Marxism” as an allusion to the Cold War era. This anti-Americanism, as it is best called, originates domestically rather than from abroad.

President Trump’s actions against EBT Stamps and “youths” in Washington DC show orientation of Americans who are sick of leftist-Southern temperaments ruining the cities. Unfortunately, there is no successor and Trump is mismanaging the economy, so expect leftism to come roaring back.

The key question for American Jews will be convincing the population that they were not running social experiments on everybody. We can clearly see the usage of “code words” to communicate and the admittance of a Bantu-Judeo synchronization during the German-American Conference at Harvard University. Will they now say they are not responsible for it and somebody else did it? Many are not convinced of the idea of “Jewish Super-IQ™️.”

If you create a list of major factions and their interests you may be able to see what combination of peoples would thread the needle. Every coalition is a compromise, the coalition you can create depends upon all groups giving up some value, so it holds that the coalition comes from people discarding whatever is least energetically costly. Is it American Whites deciding neutrality versus Muslims? Is it Hispanics no longer being seen as Hispanic/Black? Will it be American Blacks who choose to “act white”? Obviously I believe the Bantu-Judeo emotional leftists feminists are discriminating against me, using Color Theory and promoting degeneracy, so I do not see myself on that side.

Tyranny and the technological singularity

Ironically, the left created a right wing of angry people who care less about moral considerations now by overusage of moral attacks without reason. By their own actions they have created that which they fear and hate the most.

The only alternative to the technological-tyrannical singularity is to truly and in good faith believe you can coexist with other types of people, to try and understand others without infringing upon them, and to openly advocate for your interests. Fewer and fewer people seem to want, or even be able to do this.

What do I mean by singularity? Like how some say God is the father, the son, and Jesus Christ, I believe the leader, the State, and the people are one and the same. Each person (or many as possible) carries the spirit of the State within them and can be a leader. The Sign of the Cross is the four capitals: the North Capital, the South Capital, the East Capital, and the West Peace.

The State will lead to the speciation of the human race because nouns and official documentation such as passports or ID cards are discrete while human villages are continuous and a mix of gradient. Languages used to be a gradient from one city to the next, but now States enforce hard borders.

Technology will allow mutual context to be created between members of the same State despite having never met each other, a feature previously served by centralized media. Modern systems of trust like Experian credit scores are currently too weak for this purpose.

Since the State has taken over the efforts of defense, electricity, water production, and transportation—it is only natural it will take up the efforts of clothing, housing, material goods, perhaps food, and such.

It will do this by abiding by the Minimum Standard—a high quality set of basics beyond which is extraneous consumption. Currently, we do not see the values and morals of the State except in education books. The State will become more like a corporation that produces these standard goods for members of the State (limited so people do not arbitrage these things away) where you can go to the store of the State, read books about political philosophy, and purchase these goods.

The values of the State can thus live in these franchises, bringing order across the country.

Without the basic education of the State, the water system, the electricity system, people would be nothing. One should know who their maker is.

A contradiction of capitalism is that it produces goods for people it feels are not a group, thus it has an incentive to enshittify or reduce the quality of goods over time. Without the backing of the State these manufactures will cease to exist once it runs out of markets.

This tendency of the infinite, of infinite malls and infinite planes, infinite stores and infinite goods, opposes the natural human tendency of having a fixed and set world. A limited agricultural village with distinct borders—the fields do not go on forever. Novel environments generate exploration behaviors, of which energy is required. The infinite saps man’s energy so that nothing will be produced because man is endlessly on the run.

Society is fundamentally a bubble, and it fights against other bubbles, and only the edge of the bubble is the “real society” while everything inside it is the “repeater” society. It is domestic repression and external conflict, so to speak. The edge of the bubble is the major cities and everything diffuses downwards.

The bubble tries to prevent smaller bubbles (like there are forts stationed domestically for this purpose) from emerging, such as the American Confederacy. In Germany you might have a German bubble, a German-American bubble, and a German-Muslim bubble.

Thus in the edge of the bubble the only “real” things in the world are:

• Creation of inventions and technology
• Coordination of companies and people through law, technology, and standards
• Warfare, logistics, extraction of commodities

Strong states may share an interest in cracking down on parasitic-type states such as tax-free country zones and parasitic type peoples who extractively earn claims on labor and resources (money) from a country yet seek the mobility to take their money elsewhere. Strong states will fundamentally be at peace with each other because they share commonalities with each other such as governance and wellbeing of those who reside and are citizens, a state governed by vulture elites simply seeks the instability of all strong states so they may feast wherever they go, but they use the words ‘autocratic’ or ‘democratic’ in this modern day to inspire fear in the citizens from the actual fascist-communist tyrannical states which once predominated. By calling everything a genocide, they devalue those who in actuality experienced genocide and those who sacrificed their lives in the second Great War for the freedoms we enjoy today.

On Racism

I’m paraphrasing Clarence Thomas, but the left at the high level is actually racist and pretends they are not—the right is at least open about it or is not necessarily racist, just makes bad jokes. The control the left has of the media creates a high-low impression of racism where most on the “low” side of the left are good people, and inverted for the right.

Conservative American Blacks such as Thomas or Sowell recognize this DEI promotion hurts them in the long run—their competence is doubted when such programs are in place.

	Left (Democrats)	Right (Republicans)
High	Hidden Racists	Egalitarian
Low	Accepting	Overt Racists

The left is frequently claiming “white people” are the problem, that the upper leadership needs less “pale, male, and Yale” and that “the future looks like people who are not like me.” Raised in a United States given to see people equally, I reject these moral attacks against one of the most productive demographics of American society.

We were not raised to really see color although we acknowledge its existence: the older belief was of meritocracy, truth, and adherence to standards rather than dogma. Until the left started imposing their beliefs and group-segregated values upon everyone else, we welcomed everybody.

The left is at its core Bantu-Judeo and feminist/emotional women who seek to control men and this unity comes from their shared implicit speaking patterns and consumption enjoying attitude, and through the control of the media and fake personalities in real life pick up other groups by “seeming nice” and good. Many on the left will attempt to reinvent themselves as “trad” women once some inflection point hits and it seems they are losing, like the FT will suddenly publish pro-Chinese articles given the lack of USAID funding. Recently they published something about caviar and are saying “China has become largest in PPP terms.”

Go back a year and you see stuff like… “(implied tyrannical) gun-toting dogs.”

I think it unlikely that those formerly on the left will suddenly be able to worm their way into the emerging right: their attempts at using “signaling words” such as replacing “Asian” with “East Asia” such as in the recent book Rigged has too much of the wordplay and lying tricks of the left. Other parts of the leftist media machine include the egghead bald dudes at Vox. Noah Smith is now dropping the suffixes and saying “West Europe” in an analytical Chinese language sort of way.

Digression on languages

Actually, there is a problem with the English language in the modern age: it doesn’t compress as well as Chinese digitally to communicate ideas quickly and directly. we wud ned 2 type lik this.

There problem w. Eng lang. in modern age: compress not well vs Chinese, ideas communicate not fast/direct.

English had a great advantage over Chinese in the printing press age, but now suffers notable disadvantage in a fast world. Yet by losing its emotion, it becomes less convincing as is practiced by modern speakers of the language.

Rutte: “Imagine, a conflict reaching every home, every workplace. Destruction, mass mobilization, millions displaced. Widespread suffering, extreme losses. It is a terrible thought. But if we deliver on our commitments, this is a tragedy we can prevent. NATO is here to protect 1 billion people on both sides of the Atlantic. Our mission is to protect you, your families, and your future. We cannot let down our guard, and we won’t. I count on our governments to…”

English likely needs to evolve into two forms: one that carries the emotion of old (“high language”) and a simplified analytic form for communications.

Governance of populations that need emotion in their daily life with an analytic and systematic form will present difficulties in the US. I’ve encountered many American blacks working in American airports and cashiers who seem mildly irritated and annoyed that people don’t come by and say “how are you?” to them, though there are some of this population able to adapt and are okay with systematic ways of life. I haven’t noticed this same phenomenon for Muslims in German airports, but it may be that I’m annoyed and unhappy in the East Coast US airports because everything is loud and shitty (JFK, I’m thinking of you) and happier in the Helsinki airport (or Dulles, Ronald Reagan, etc.) for example, so this bleeds into my interactions with people.

Back to leftist code-wording

Like how women often repeat after men they like, this characteristic behavior and shapeshifting has become too obvious and exposed in the internet age for public intellectuals to distance themselves away from. You are who you are and have chosen to be; life is path-dependent. I propose an alternative, which is to admit that you held certain beliefs in the past, yet acknowledge that the present and future can be different.

Unlike in the West, they cannot really camoflauge themselves in the East. Hence if they are to go there and try to marry in, they will breed themselves out of existence. I don’t personally have anything against Jews; I hope they can live safe and happy lives, I am just describing to you some of the word/signaling behaviors that writers of that class tend to use.

All the recent American English discourse is stupid and emotional: “vibe coding, bits and atoms, human flourishing.” They promote these tendencies because they want people to stop using the language systematically because it would threaten their power, or they may actually not remember the State at all even if they seek to organize and mean well. An emotional word like “flourishing” I believe is at odds with the organization and diligence of governance. I reject it, because I grew up in the Old West and this was not my culture, nor do I find a present presentation of this modern culture in gambling apps and grift to be appealing.

It’s actually really dumb because I think students go to highly ranked colleges and they feel like they are learning some hidden language to watch out for key words, instead of just discussing what needs to be done. It’s a behavior that is opposite to the free exchange of ideas and perspectives.

Regardless of your sentiment, President Trump is owed a great deal of gratitude for defunding the propaganda-racism machine of USAID, as much of the anti-Chinese sentiment on reddit and the internet seemed to disappear overnight. I don’t know if this anecdote and my personal feeling represents those of the East as a whole (I knew of a Vietnamese-descent associate who planned to join ICE), I believe the right would find ready people to join the military-industrial complex stemming from the realist attitude.

The left has attempted to interfere with other cultures and values: by changing Latino/Latina to Latinx, or German Lehrer/Lehrerin Lehrer*in (who the fk puts an apostrophe in between a word?), they demonstrate their own egoism and lack of sensitivity to other cultures.

Domestically the goal for Americans, I believe, is to extirpate the still-strong Bantu-Judeo emotional left from the university system, the NGO complex, and the media. I can only speak for myself but I think for many some of the defining characteristics are: we don’t believe the Jews to be some unique protected class given the actions of Israel, and we don’t want to fight your black-white color wars because I meet many new immigrants such as from the Horn of Africa or Ethiopia, and they are not “black,” or more specifically “American Blacks” because they are not Western Bantu, they have Amharic background, and their history is different. Likewise, Europeans are not “white,” or more specifically “American Whites” though they fit better into the demographic-economic-cultural majority of the United States. At the same time, we reject the chauvinism of any one demographic-cultural-economic group: a sort of pluralistic society will be needed. We know people like Shaun Maguire hate Mamdani for the sole reason that he’s a Muslim, we hate Shaun for that reason and would support anyone he opposes for that sole reason. Yet perhaps if both love America and want its success, then they find themselves on the same side against those who hate America and seek to destroy it.

It’s hard to deal with domestic conflicts without people getting caught in the crossfire. Those who see USAID and Voice of America dismembered remember the old free world against Soviet malign and many actual scientific researchers with no political leaning are being defunded.

Because the left rose to power through subversion, they are habitually limited in their ability to speak the truth directly. They prefer partying and emotional games like going to the club.

Lots of American white women will be some of the proponents of this ‘anti-white’ culture because sometimes in society when women get older, some will become very bitter and resentful for it and it comes out in different ways like owning dangerous dogs such as pitbulls. Mostly, it comes out of the behaviors of men chasing foreign tail rather than upholding the civilization.

This idea of Global South and Global North feels so last century to me, as much as East and West. If I go to a small European city or small town in America and talk with people who have barely been outside of their town, this is not the Englishman of the 1800s. And I can imagine a future where the Chinese have built a mighty military machine and blue-water navy only to venture out and see the ruins of lost civilizations, hungry souls unsure of their place in the world and a few laggard ostrich-ape hybrids both with head stuck in sand and the self-aggrandizement of chest beating.

I don’t know, that’s what I saw growing up in the West and then lifting myself up and beyond and above the circumstances around me. Maybe I haven’t seen the real world of elites, but we’re all stuck on this planet, I doubt there is really that much more to it. I’ve been inside the Supreme Court, the Augusta National, Harvard University, they’re all just buildings at the end of the day though they are impressive to people when you are young.

I feel sad for the tired and poor in a way that one from the East staring down rows of needful job-seekers in career fair line for a well known finance firm to my impression doesn’t. I think he worked for a quant firm.

On the Muslim/Germany Connection

I have some Turkish friends in Germany. But whereas before the colored world was united against colonialism, I increasingly do not feel it is relevant anymore. The European colonial empires were dismantled by the Americans and Soviets, the British and French were stopped at the Suez in the 1950s, and at times I meet young British who are cognizant that the world of their leaders is the world of yesterday.

When I am in Germany, I remember this old world as Lee Kuan Yew would: I see the grand boulevards and the culture, I drink Gerolsteiner and cured meats. But for the Muslims it is not halal, it is different. I am colored, yet I am not. The East is developed, the South is developing. They dislike the AfD, I can to some degree understand their points around migration. Europe was high trust: you could get on the train without gates (and in some places you often still can but I am thinking the government is naive for letting people do so), but people will take advantage of this.

I find the introduction of Southern races into Europe making it a lower trust society to be a great shame and although there are many who are productive and diligent citizens the barrier function was not discerning enough, this is where I most significantly differ from those whom perhaps we were once or would be united in distant past. They see themselves united, I feel myself only able to admit a portion of them to the common table and they do not want to see their brothers left outside. I do not like the noise, the dancing, the disruption to the peace—I might sooner find myself in Leipzig (great train station, btw) than in Hamburg again, but being of upbringing in the West and South I admit I find a certain humor in it those of the East are less able to appreciate.

I think you can integrate MENA people into Europe over time because they are somewhat ethnically similar. I think integrating all corners of the Old World into one country will be difficult because systematic ways of thinking common in the East are contrary to emotional ways of being of the South.

Eastern-Western Hybrids

We are the same in that we grow up in a new country, yet we do not just imitate the cultural-demographic-economic majority. I think Eastern-Western hybrids are few in nature, and even fewer who see society at the deeper levels. LKY was one, I once met Johnathon Bi at the UATX Forbidden Courses in Texas and he seemed to be this style as well. Monsieur le Baron on X.com is likely similar. I don’t mean mixed by blood, but a basis rooted in the East, a form and phenotype honed in the old West. But besides LKY, the other two strike me as less Eastern.

Where I differ from many other in my position (I feel that many others grovel, but I challenge) is my unwillingness to do the templating of what is to be done by an upper class who believes they can print money to control labor with simultaneous distain for everyone who works for them: bring Mexicans to come in and do the construction and labor, bring in Chinese and South Koreans (idk where all the Japanese went) to do the technical things, have African Americans and Hispanics work all the operational roles at universities and airports to keep things running, all while simultaneously denigrating Europe yet needing foreigners to staff the top universities and companies while being unable and unwilling to raise domestic talent.

I think the United States that was fundamentally good and concerned for the well-beings of other people was not just a distant mirage or propaganda; it was real and I know of it, but it lies so far from our present day.

Colonization, squeeze, emotional races

Colonization in either its Greek or Latin forms implies either in the Greek case: an independent self-sustaining city-state or in the Latin case: an imperial agricultural settlement. How could Africa be colonized if today the whites are increasingly being squeezed out of South Africa and Rhodesia is no more? As Kamil Galeev wrote: the New World, Australia, and even Africa was basically considered depopulated by European metrics. We know from Aurelius that there is no purity of descent in the origins, and that man has displaced other man for time immemorial, and at the same time a mix of peoples were coming into the new world as the Indonesians are in present time removing the West Paupans, there lies conflict in Ethiopia and the Tigray, and the Chinese were displacing the indigenous of Formosa.

It was not so much colonization as it has been that the last few decades allowed the taken-down-a-tier European countries to share in the American group feeling.

With the future: it is a squeeze from both sides: the rabble of the Southern races on one half and the technology of the Chinese on the other half. As a general rule, the Westerners either have a bias for the emotion and feelings of the South and a fear of the East, or they respect order and structure, are disgusted by the South, and admire the constructions of the East.

MAGA, which seeks to “Make America Great Again,” recognizes that America was great, is currently struggling, but can be great again with the right choices. The left believe that they are “prestigious and the best,” so they don’t have to listen to anyone else, which is why they can’t come to the belief or idea that another race of people may be wealthier/better than them, and that they would need help one day.

Trump is not doing anything particularly new. He is going back to a time common in the value system I grew up in: one where America is seen as strong, healthy, and with good families (RFK, seed oils), one where athleticism and pride in country is celebrated (Patriot Games, military parade), and a characterization of the world using Capitalized Nouns, Verbs, and Facts rather than “silicon valley all lowercasism.” When you choose to use “silicon valley lowercase” instead of normal, academic spelling, you are choosing an political decision to believe in an emotional model of the world.

Someone who recognizes they are not in a leading position is okay going from London to Singapore: the culture lives on, things work albeit they are slightly different, and they may need to take a junior as opposed to a senior role. Parts of the East carry on the spirit of the Old West, those in the mass media West with emotional temperament can’t mentally accept this because their whole worldview is around being better than everyone, vibes, lies, “status”, and trying to manipulate others and come up with “ahh, Lee Kuan Yew is a dictator!!!! Dictator = bad!!!!”

That’s also a strong synergy I should point out: the self-inflated sense of importance of feminists of their own value and the emotional left of their own importance. (Those who play emotional games who are on the right, actually just form another corner of the systematic-emotional triangle, of which they occupy another edge of the base no different than that of the left.)

I must admit I feel bad for the native populations (or at least, more historically native than us recent arrivals), and they have certain anxieties from being a smaller proportion and less able to reap the dividends of what they thought their future. You see this in Europe when foreign languages abound, and sometimes a tinge of surprise when I speak to them a few words of their native language. For these anxieties I do not blame them, as they did not personally vote to import myriad foreigners to compete against them, but at the same time they must reject the attitudes of complacency and humor to fight for a place in a globalized world.

They take to their loss of status poorly, like an Englishman in the Helsinki airport food stand. He makes jokes at me in the bantering British way, I smile and tell him his jokes are funny. He feels dejected and does not even want to further chat in an egalitarian way. At least he has his south of the Sahara friend/coworker who remains by his side. Am reminded of the downward mobility of some high school peers too. They may not see it yet though.

America and Europe have high stocks but flows are decreasing. Leadership is the arbitration of human wills (negotiation, war), the management of flows (distribution and extraction of resources), and the creation of abstractions (words and legal structures, engineering). Flows are a function of object-transformation ability. Goal is to structure environment to increase flows for growth. Lack of flows in surplus leads to inability of the structure to sustain itself, like lack of blood kills a limb, lack of food starves a person, lack of students ends a school. Immigration may take in bad flows instead of choosing reduced flows, a school may admit bad students instead of shrinking down. This shows unwillingness to reduce consumption when necessary for the greater good. Stocks can to some degree catabolize themselves in lieu of flows. Immigration is not selective enough to distinguish “metabolic-cognitive” capacity of individuals without lossy comparisons like calendar age. All existence is based upon the management of energy.

In the United States, those at the base agree with the East for the stability and structure provided to society as opposed to some of the degeneracy of the South. But at the top, the East is in competition with the West, and as elites they are insulated from the South, so they uplift those in the South and discriminate against those from the East.

The thing these emotional races have, is that words seem to actually physically hurt them. The Southern races and feminist women are overrepresented in this category. By feminist women, I mean those who hate men and society and have an overinflated sense of self worth. They are always throwing barbs at other people in small-scale social games or avoiding the truth.

If the emotional races and feminists believe ideas inherently are dangerous and to censor them, and that the root function of language is malign and subtle control, and that the American idea which stems from Europe is to them illegitimate, does this not fundamentally find itself in opposition with the American Constitution and the founding of the republic? And should we not root out these traitors to the nation, who attempt to subtly change the context and moral high ground in speaking, deflect reasonable concerns, imitate yet desecrate the communication of human beings, and destroy all that has come before them? And that such rights and Amendments to the Constitution which were extended out of goodwill can, in fact, be remade with force seeing the premise that all men and women deserved to be treated equally, though they are not equal in how they are made, is itself flipped on its head to prioritize the consumption of a minority group at the cost of all other citizens?

Excerpts are from Notes of a Native Son.

When the technological races make their move, the Earth itself shifts. When technologists and systems thinkers describe social phenomenon, the emotional races and women are possessed by a mix of discomfort, fear, and trepidation. They squirm in their chairs. I think that as a society is smaller-scale, these social phenomenon are intuitive to the human themselves. Those who have good metabolic development do not see society this way (that is, they do not like conspiracies), so they have to mentally craft an understanding of what these other types of humans intuitively feel.

So these smaller-scale society people are always trying to restrain the systems thinkers from paying attention to them by censoring and hiding this social nature of the world.

If there were not minorities in the United States there would have been more significant divisions between personalities and temperaments that would have bubbled to the surface anyhow. But maybe it wouldn’t have been so extreme.

Realist account on X.com 1JZ recognizes the necessity of war, does not take nuclear as taboo, knows the true nature of the world. Obtain information, coordinate people, restructure the world.

This already happens: Entire continents and countries turned into beef farms! I like grass-fed beef from Uruguay, Brazil, and Australia. Flying into Costa Rica an entire field of just flowers in exchange for USD. Coffee shops and high-manufacture countries change demand for crops in other countries, turning them into plantations.

At what human cost does the three dollar pineapple at Costco, the imperial tribute, come from?

Large countries believe nuclear proliferation is bad not for environmental or human concerns. It simply restricts their own movement and power. If we want peace in the world, should we not proliferate nuclear bombs to all countries? (I am not recommending we do this, but it is a thought experiment).

All power politics today is hidden by the relations of scientific man, a stochastic and numbers-based governance by distance:

• The draft = economic incentives for signing up for army, making people poor so that’s their own choice forward so as to seem it is made by their own decision
• The tribute = allowing foreign multinationals to come into your company and have unrestricted media propaganda and flows of people to come to your country to work
• Eugenics = putting more abortion clinics in a place and food degradation
• Killing someone for resources = economic denial, prices
• Brawls = lawyers

If any organization can solve this stochastic governance with a tight-knit group generating much friction and heat just from the proximity of being near each other, they may find themselves able to chomp through the loosely organized distance-media governance before the webs of constriction (this scientific governance covers larger areas, is slower to react, yet maintains extraordinary strength from pulling in members from all over) congregate upon such a group.

The spooks are watching

You know, I think I was the first one who thought about the “Asian rape gangs” in British English being ethnically ambiguous compared to American English and brought that up in a sorta-Harvard Signal group chat that I stay in for the purposes of having a channel open. It’s good to have dialogue even with people you disagree with. Nobody really posts in it though, it’s pretty dead. The globalist meme-complex then rebranded them as “Muslim rape gangs” and “Pakistani rape gangs,” you can barely find any mention of them in Google now. However, in my above analysis of “pedophiles versus rapists,” I believe “Asian rape gangs” may actually be appropriate when talking about steppe invasions and the subsequent psychology of resultant places.

I also sent my article about foldy ears to John Mearsheimer and this Beijing lawyer dude on Substack who writes poems. In the analytics I saw they shared the articles to other people, they didn’t get back to me though. >:( Seriously, you can tell people’s personality and cognition by looking at their biological developmental features. I don’t know how other people didn’t think of this before. Shouldn’t we all be trying to find Elite Human Capital and improve everyone’s health!??!

I was at the GAC and in conversation loosely brought up this idea of East, West, and South to some people. Recently an article by Alexander Stubb appeared in Foreign Affairs where he talks of “global West, East, and South.”

A triangular contest among what I call the global West, the global East, and the global South is taking shape. In choosing either to strengthen the multilateral system or seek multipolarity, the global South will decide whether geopolitics in the next era leans toward cooperation, fragmentation, or domination.

Yeah, I mean the triangular shape is there for anyone to see. But I don’t think anyone would’ve guessed what I meant was race science, nor would they have grouped certain groups into the South instead of geographically.

There are a lot of possibilities for the future. Maybe instead of as Stubb says, the South is not the swing vote and the East just has an overwhelming advantage against both parties. One or both of the parties could disintegrate, maybe moreso the West at this point. If Trump America is ahead in ideas compared to liberal Europe and liberal China, then the future may turn toward unchecked migration into China and disintegration (I don’t read much Chinese media due to language skills not being good enough, gut feeling tells me they are probably unlikely to do this). Current Chinese government seems quite liberal: they still talk of international order and rules. I’m pretty sure the values of socialism are just the Chinese equivalent of United Nations SDGs.

Some European leaders do not see that some members of Southern races absolutely hate them and want to destroy their continent from inside out while living there like a parasitic worm. Still are promoting “anti-racism” things which is 5-6 years outdated in USA. While Trump suggesting to invade Greenland and Canada is oafish, his recognition of such realities is clarid. Because Germans were grouped into “white people” at the German-American Conference it can be said the Bantu-Judeo left wants to destroy Europe because they are seen as “naive colonialists unaware of what they have done,” and there are perhaps equal historical grievances against Europe by Jews.

I hang out with people on the left, they are too emotional and consumptive and often compulsive liars. People on the right are self-aggrandizing, their meanness of those who do not meet standards is something I see in myself. Yet I feel not so hard-hearted in that way. Talk with people from the past, our cognitive processing of the world differs. Hang out with specialists, lose focus of the world. Talk with generalists, they understand few specifics. Damn, guess I will sit here and write my blog and try to start a business instead.

Could use some more frens ^-^

Even if you are a spooky ghost 👻

---

More Travel Anecdotes

Every travel experience brings about some new observations and experiences. One hypothesis I wanted to test on this trip was the idea of arbitraging USD to live in EU. For the most part, I think it can work! But I just don’t see the benefits of big cities that much anymore, I think I need to do some sort of program so I am meeting people.

Living in NYC for $1500 a month while the subway smells of piss is disgusting, and I don’t want to live in a major city for the ‘lifestyle’ but rather to improve my income. Supposedly heard “all the meetings” happen there, but I’m unsure whether I could be part of that network making all the deals and whatnot.

The thing is, I’m still limited on two accounts of this travel lifestyle. First, I need to make a lot more money to “fly to anywhere I want, whenever I want” and stay at anywhere I want. Many business hotels of reasonable quality cost $200/night, and going too low on price ends up in dirty/sketchy Airbnbs or hostels where I could get my laptop stolen.

Second, a remote job doesn’t mean you are free and flexible to go many places. The working hours restrict how much you can travel and move around, and if you’re in a new place you tend to want to explore. I would probably need to make closer to $10k a month to even start considering that type of lifestyle. I may get there once near age 26/27.

Third, I don’t know if my blog means I am now considered a “political influencer” and thus makes me an employment liability.

Fourth, if you are working a remote job you are not really that connected to the local environment and culture of the place around you.

Congratulations to the Mamdanis but I must borrow them to make my analogy: some of these photos capture NYC really well, living in the ruins of a once great civilization where people now just work on gambling apps.

Don’t even know what to say about the books now. They used to be much more wholesome—PBS, NPR, Sesame Street, etc. all served as part of this flagship media environment. The kids now seem to mainly watch this skibidi toilet thing and YouTube videos.

I have some rules and thoughts for travel:

• Do not stay in a place for more than 3-4 days because often I get tired of it very quickly
• After this most recent trip, I should plan things 2 weeks in advance. Western Europe works off of calendars and spontaneous does not work super well because expensive.
• Should bring bathroom wipes b.c. USA no bidet, do not bring two laptops (work and personal) otherwise too heavy, if you do maybe make sure it has a case so don’t compress the laptop screen when stacking two against each other
• Need “shell” type pants for winter clothing sub 0C, otherwise the wind gets in.
• Need compression bag for down insulation layer, or maybe use merino layer b.c. down flammable and plastic-bag like and hard to clean despite being lighter
• No need to bring a compass/thermometer/whistle/magnifying glass multi-tool. Maybe whistle if swimming, but I don’t do that much. Maybe compass/thermometer/magnifying glass for fires if I was in the woods, but I don’t do that.
• Headlamp is surprisingly useful, esp. for just going on walks around a house or at night without turning on the lights and disturbing others.
• Should get merino leg warmers and sweater because these under-layers get a light smelling oil-dirt-sweat patina quickly and feel cold
• The international terminals are the good ones (BOS, DTW). Good looking front door, dark underbelly.
• People from good families ands places in europe can come to USA ands enjoy it despite the subway, I am here in NYC and it reminds me I can fall to the bottom at any time. Depsite being middle class and employed you feel like a poor person.
• Whistle and compass have not had to use. Maybe whistle if swimming, but I don’t do that much. Thermometer/compass, no, I don’t go camping/hiking much. Magnifying glass maybe? to burn some ants?
• One time slippers made of paper not necessary. If floor clean anyways they are not needed, if the floor is dirty I’m staying in a shit place I shouldn’t be there anyways.
• holy shit boston to iceland they just scanned my face like a chinese university gate scanner. East and West are converging.
• European houses don’t have American industrialism: sink disposals, plentiful machines laying around like dryer/AC/dehumidifier in garage and build-it-yourself
• German blankets are nice, the proper size too. Just blanket and pillow and bedsheet. Idk why American hotels have so many useless layers.
• Meridol toothpaste has cool twist cap that doesn’t require foil to be thrown away.
• cashier was pissed at me because I bought the REWE Premium Select Beef Bresola for 5 EUR once and they have to eat deli ham
  • There’s a problem, which I call the grumpy cashier problem, where if you don’t know if the cashier is grumpy or not and doesn’t want to greet you, you just say your basic hellos and nothing more. Most people seem to have either too much emotion or zero affect at all, but economic times are hard so there may be external reasons. It’s a problem because only iterated games are winnable in that sense, if someone decides they want to defect then even though it makes everyone poorer (globally over time, because such values are corrosive), they still win that small iteration.
• Maybe some similarities between Confederacy, Bayern/Austria, and Southern China. North conquers South. People in South still try to feel good about themselves, but they got conquered cause they were less serious in personality? I see this pattern across all three regions. Northeasteners, Prussians, Beijingers are all more strict/shouting/straightforward.
• I am not saying people don’t deserve housing, but I simply don’t see how the economic benefit from someone who works in a supermarket is comparable to the effort and labor put into tiling a floor, building a house and setting windows, and so on. It’s all very high quality work.
• New apps: Wolt, FreeNow
• Lot of the coin stuff for shopping cart/bathroom is like death by a thousand cuts

I think there should be another rule for conferences as well, which is that conferences with too many people are sometimes a headache, because there are too many new people and people passing in and passing out, so people sometimes ask if you are part of the school or staying around for the long term as to whether you are a student.

• Go to conference or event by self, don’t meet people or sometimes it’s too big of a conference—it sucks.
• Visit a city and just walk around going to supermarkets, it sucks.
• Go with a group, you might find the group annoying.

That’s life I guess. You get married, regret it. Don’t, regret it.

Want a place where the right commute isn’t stressful: dodging cars in a cramped European city isn’t fun, nor is taking public transport/buses and it smells bad on the inside and I get carsick. My vision for the future doesn’t have to just be an old and historical city but independence, nature, and micromobility. The below is decidedly not nice! I am debating whether I prefer Soviet-style copy-paste apartments as seen in Eastern Europe/Finland with walkability or American copy-paste suburbs with no walkability.

Money system and group feeling system

The more you can scale group feeling, the less you depend upon money. Ideally we should have a mix of both, so that strangers can easily have group feeling and pool resources but also use the money system.

When traveling, you are often dependent upon the money system. What if you could travel with the group feeling system? Society has too much money system now, not enough group feeling. Need to scale it the other direction so that high-trust, competent, and clean people can get together.

Why I find travel annoying

First, you don’t meet great people staying in Airbnbs. You might if you stay in the Four Seasons Hotel lobby, but you have to bring something to the table. Had an Airbnb host who said that during her study abroad in the New York decades ago, the teacher would leave the room which to her was unjustifiable because supposedly around her all the German students cheated on tests. This speaks more of the people around her and her own values than it does of either Germany or the United States.

Airbnbs follow a few different forms, which include:

• People renting out a room for more money (I don’t think most wealthy people who made their lives would want to invite strangers who may steal things in)
• Airbnb slums (4-5 rooms all for rent)

They are nevertheless usually cheaper than hotels.

Travel complexity hell

This is:

• Moving to a new neighborhood and city, figuring out how to use the transport (it’s a different card or system in every place and you might have to find an ATM or download a new app), and from choosing from multiple Airbnbs to find a reasonably priced and not terrible quality one.

Types of trust

• Tyrannical no trust
  • This is your American vending machine, where you are dispensed only the amount you have ordered, or coins required to operate the washer. This tends to be better for sparse areas compared to gated trust, which usually seem to occur in dense areas where people are in proximity.
• Gated trust
  • This is your Icelandic vending machine or Finnish washing room: you scan your card and then you can enter/open the gates freely and use the machines without being subject to the restrictions of tyrannical trust. Example: I scan my boarding pass and open the vending machine door to select items, and I get charged automatically. Then I close the door.
• Surveillance trust
  • This is the Chinese surveillance camera system, where there is trust because everything is documented. Or everything someone speaks is recorded to create a system of truth.
• Open trust
  • This is like a subway that has no checks and open gates. This is untenable in the modern age, and I think it an insult to those who are law-abiding that there are no systems to prevent freeloaders.

Helsinki

• Often see reasonably priced homes with people starting new families/just bought a house/etc. doing some entrepreneurial activity Airbnb it out. 250 EUR or USD for 1 week near-ish (sorta suburb, so 30 min drive away) I think is a decent deal? These are good: stable and trying to make it in the world. Other choices are an overpriced hotel or a slumlord Airbnb like houses near college campuses.

• City center feels kind of like Dresden because of these thick stone curbs.

• Need anti-slippy shoes for winter (ice) and stone stairs!!!! I see how someone can fall down the stairs and get torso damage. It doesn’t hit your head, it seems to hit your body multiple times as you fall. First my foot and the stone lost friction, I used my arms and hands to sort of brace myself, but as I was sliding down my mid-section took a lot of blunt force damage. Head was okay as I was standing up and able to keep upright.

• Lots of MENA people as Uber drivers, bus drivers. I thought to myself at first a waste of talent to have engineers doing this, but it does make for a pleasant drive where I would not prefer the alternative of a perfume-laden dude honking and shouting at traffic.

  • pakistan government took some bribe form the usa for few million, betrayed their people, betrayed china what the uber driver told me. USA is not that popular around these parts.

• Helsinki is weird as shit, it feels like the USA 10 years ago, kind of nicer malls, things are stable and works, USA pop music and things are nice

• in general, people value what they do not have

  • euros value space (thought sleeping in tiny bed would be fine but it’s not)
  • drying machine laundry is important otherwise towels are not soft
  • would benefit from having a dehumidifier and AC, but not to the extent people on the internet cry about it

Living Comparison

Life is a combination of: housing, transportation, supermarkets, employment, people, and weather. I think the convergence by wealthy people to tree-lined neighborhoods close to the city is not coincidental. If you can’t get that a suburb is often preferable to the city itself. But if the city becomes a giant suburb then it becomes bad.

Housing

Decent:

• Living out in a quietish suburb that is not copy-paste, has some places nearby walkable, AWAY FROM THE ROAD SOUND
• Living in the middle of nowhere (have to drive everywhere which is annoying but OKish)

Hellish:

• Plastic laminate floors, copy-paste American suburbs, nothing but strip malls
• Density and noise like NYC
• Living in a >20 story building or giant apartment buildings

Transportation

From most liked to disliked.

Pretty enjoyable:

• Biking/Walking/Scootering around a semi-dense city (Leipzig, Vienna, many European city suburbs)
• Sitting on the commuter rail late at night with few people (like S-Bahn or Helsinki ring train)

Acceptable:

• Driving on a country road
• Biking/Walking/Scootering around a dense city (Manhattan, Amsterdam, Helsinki city centers)
• Driving in a place that is like the suburbs but not super big city, or in a place like Washington DC/Seattle
• Being packed on the train so long as I’m not carrying my backpack or other things

Hellish:

• Sitting in a plane (I can tolerate it but I don’t like it)
• Driving in a place like Atlanta or Dallas
• Being packed on the noisy and smelly public transport bus
• Driving a crappy car

Hamburg

• Women are scared of the Lime scooter whirr
• Rewe to go gas station: locked up at 3AM and you had to get things from a glass window, the one in Cologne was open 24/7.
• German stone textured walls are not that good, the smoothness of American or Finnish drywall is nicer
• Kind of large and grimy tbh. Did not like it.
• Think Germany is too dense/populated now as I get older. Might prefer Finland, idk about other Nordic countries, haven’t been.

The Elbphilharmonie

This place is terrible. It’s like a grotesque, sacrificial panopticon prison vessel (seriously, people are seated 360 degrees around the performers) made to insult classical music, but I don’t think anyone else realizes the place is meant as a torture chamber with the shrilling acoustics and strong overhead lighting, nor realizes the difference in forms. The insides shapes are organic like formless flesh dotted with botfly hole wall designs and botfly ceiling lamps. The bug and zombie motif is palpable in this building.

The reason the 360 degree sitting is wrong is because hierarchy is an inherent feature of classical music, order, structure, and that time period. The arena is the wrong motif, it is the crowd, the call-and-response, the rabble and the mob.

This is the equivalent of the Japanese Government-General building in front of Korea’s royal palace. A monument to postmodern victory. Perhaps something similar will be done to it in time too.

During the concert itself the harsh overhead lighting is a concentrated beam projected down at the musicians as if an alien spacecraft were about to vaporize them.

Despite me immediately realizing this place was meant to make a mockery of music, the people around me seemed to applaud and like it as if somebody slaughtered their children and replaced them with automatons and they said “we love it!” with a smile on their face.

The overhead point lighting is an example of how Bantu postmodernism is spreading itself through architecture: the only place the sun is directly and harshly overhead as a point source is near the equator. In northern climates the sun tends to be angled lower and more diffuse.

The people clap and applaud yet I know it is wrong. I recommend the Grand Elysee Hamburg lobby if one wants to be in a place that feels right, or I liked the Dresden Kulturpalast.

Bamberg

Short stayover while I was remote working. I didn’t visit the city because I don’t care about old tourist things, they don’t affect my life.

There were a lot of organic fiber style mats as carpets. Wood in the tiled German bathrooms look nice because they contrast the cold of tile. There are different potato names at Rewe like Antonia and Markies, as opposed to “Russett, Yellow, Red.” I think they’re higher quality too.

Goose and duck breast cold cuts are very oily because they need to float.

Brotzeit.

Misc

I will in the future at some point, elaborate on the following topics:

• The nature of women in general and of different races, and why men of all races who are keen to uphold stability should understand about miscegenation and hypergamous behavior
• The values of the West past the second Great War, the old American culture, and what it was
• I took Singapore Airlines back. 5th freedom flight FRA-NYC. Liked the towel service and warm colored inside with Christmas wreaths as opposed to Delta/Lufthansa/IcelandicAir grey/coldness.

Future Actions

Some describe the present economy for young people as a Zugzwang economy: you must make a move, but every move is bad.

I am going to enumerate a list of potential actions that I see as manageable:

Increase income:

• Create an app for the purposes of enhancement of group feeling
• Create media channels and distribution for navigating the modern world and my personal observations on it

Increase mobility:

• Purchase of a 170/M down jacket (currently mine is 175/L which is a poor fit and annoying during travel), maybe from Montbell
• Purchase of merino shirts and a sweater as opposed to cotton, which sweats in winter and quickly smells bad
• Get shaver other than Xiaomi MSX201, the lid keeps falling off in the holding bag
• Purchase of iPhone 15 CA/EU version with both SIM and eSIM availability (as opposed to US iPhone 15 with only eSIM). My battery is starting to die on iPhone 12 Mini, and USB-C everything finally. Might get the 17 since 120Hz though.

Increase minimalism:

• Sort and organize the house, trash or sell unneeded items
• Potential debates:
  • Increase quality of house from crappy beige carpet to something easier to clean and does not smell bad. Problems: they are doing construction outside and making the area likely worse over time. Don’t think it’s a worthwhile investment if I don’t plan here long term.
  • Purchase an automobile. Problems: would have to sell it, limits myself to this region, I still don’t really need it. Volvo factory in South Carolina, maybe cheaper here vs other states though?
• Move to a higher tier city and try to establish myself at the cost of lowering savings rate.

Move up:

I roughly face these problems with regards to saving money:

• First, the “buy index funds forever” paradigm seems unsuitable for the modern age. People presume that
  • There is a specific, system-following person that plays only within the rules that this is suitable for. It is not a good fit for my personality.
• Stuffing money into a Roth IRA/401k forever, I don’t feel like it will work and I’m decreasing my mobility
  • Do we really think the retire at 60-something with a pension and Social Security is going to work for our generation?

At the same time, I don’t have any business or source where immediate capital injections produce results. If I keep saving, at some point I hit 6 figure hell where you need equity to break out of.

The rough personality/psychological issue I see with infinite retirement account money-shoveling and age-restricted tax advantaged accounts are as follows:

1. First, there will be consistent stability and the money will monotonically grow, magically assuming one is provided for in their older age.
2. Over the course of one’s life, they will not need to withdraw large amounts of money for things (starting a business, buying a car or house, major repairs, emergency travel). The cost-benefit advantage of passive investing is seen as better than any of the alternatives. (feel like there is a term for this, like optionality of money?)
3. Furthermore, this supposed cost-benefit from later compounding in life outweighs the benefit for extra optionality when young, assuming that larger hypothetical sums in the market are a better bet than one’s active ability in meeting people, starting organizations, attending conferences.
4. The belief that investment is an act of faith, and I have little faith in many modern infrastructure systems from food to clothing to schooling. That I should invest in such things at the expense of investing in actual societies or people I believe in is to me, anathema.

I do not have a preference for the near over the far. I merely believe the system is set up to fail in the far future. For example, it’s probably better to finance an iPhone because 0% (gain money from inflation, and from cash back on credit card) if not for the US model having no SIM card slot.

US Passport may become weaker in future. Also consider that optionality may be a weakness; staying put in one place may be greater wealth, in an era of fortress cities you need to be in one of them.

Currently in a Fidelity MM fund.

With regards to investing:

I am pretty sure 1JZ sees things clearly in a way the median person shoveling money into the market doesn’t. I don’t completely understand or follow the logic in some of the higher-level economics posts, e.g. why are passive investments risky in bad times? but if the thinking is accurate (and I loathe to follow yesterday’s playbook for tomorrow) there will be a need to geographically diversify.

• https://x.com/atlanticesque/status/2007890266766913734
• https://x.com/JZ281C/status/1909943620582486310
• https://x.com/JZ281C/status/1914895830386983148
• https://x.com/JZ281C/status/1990812404813287784
• https://x.com/JZ281C/status/1982799528857051500

Future worlds:

There are a few worlds I may see myself part of in the future.

One is the life of an itinerant scholar and software developer. I am unlikely to be terribly poor, but perhaps I may not be rich in this case.

If increased problems in the United States bring about some opportunity for leadership or growth, perhaps similar to the Soviet oligarch privatization but in a more beneficial way, it may be worth staying around. But a sort of “privatization” has already happened: the manufacturing offshored, private equity going around buying all the hospitals and former family-owned brands like Rimowa. Staying to pull up mounds of those who neither care for nor want economic development due to their base emotionalism would result in being deposed in ways similar to Fujimori.

If I were to stay I would likely base myself in the Midwest and Pacific Northwest to build a Western-Eastern coalition to combat the Western-Southern coastal goverance coalition in the United States. The Upper Midwest’s coldness is a biological advantage as the origins of the Northern Chinese ethnic groups come from Siberia. In temperament I found more commonalities in Iceland and Helsinki than in France or Germany.

The United States, Canada, and Mexico faces, perhaps, another Mason-Dixon line in the distant future from these differences in natural temperament. Hyperborealists and Equatorialists are self-sorting as the latter naturally seek warmer temperatures due to their lower metabolism and thyroid.

In the United States I face many Bantu-Judeo leftists and feminists who seek to stymie my existence for the sole purpose that what I speak is closer to an objective truth than the subjective truths many of them preach.

Moreover, I have major disagreements with the “Asian-American” faction, ways of thinking, and mode of life. If you people (Jews in the media) attempt to eradicate my existence by creating media which does not speak for me such as “Crazy Rich Asians,” for you merely put a cast which looks like me yet you puppet the stories and overarching narrative behind the scene, transliterating the Coldplay song “Yellow” into Chinese improperly (it does not sound like a Chinese song, it sounds like Western brain draped in Eastern facade, as opposed to how I speak which is Eastern brain with Western words in the way Lee Kuan Yew spoke), rename Chinese New Year into “Lunar New Year,” will I not treat your existence with the same contempt and callousness that you had so looked upon me with?

There is a character from the series X-MEN, in which the show took care to humanize each side for the reasons they did things. Like Magneto said, you fear us for the sole reason that we exist and are stronger and naturally more capable than you; better able to transform objects and create abstractions and shape the natural world. And yet in ways that this same character felt, I am faced with the same realization in recent years the pain I have caused people who look like you, is what you had done onto me, in ways not as extreme but not wholly dissimilar to how Magneto’s realization he slaughtered humans with the same indifference that Nazis gassed his own family.

If I cast my lot in Beijing, I would face perhaps equal if not greater problems as development in the United States, only that the problems would not be known in advance. Even with years of study, parity with English may not be achieved. I would be no less willing to throw away what I have learnt from the West than I am willing to throw away my basis in the East for if I were to imitate a Chinese ethos, in the same effect I would be doing what makes American immigrants weak: a copying and need for perceived integration by which the power is given to others as to whether you can be included or not.

But if I was there, I might be able to do what I believe will be my best work: my knowledge of Vitamin A, biofilms, vegetable oils, human nutrition, education, and society to create a biometabolically ordered society with most members at the leading edge of mental hallucination in the trinity of State, people, and leader.

I know not whether I will be a major actor of these times or merely one who paints a picture of the future, or whether I will take both and build it step by step.

My rough goal is to make enough money to support myself without too much stresses on my time and locking myself into a suburb permanently, like Mountain View CA.

---

A potential peace plan?

Here are some thoughts, in no specific order. Perhaps I am naive in stating such things because they come from the wellspring of grievances generations old, but I do state it because it may be possible.

Both Southern and Western races and temperaments move toward reconciliation. Westerners as the stronger party can stop self-aggrandizement or ethnic chauvinism, recognizing the legitimate contribution of for example, American Blacks or German-Turkish peoples to Western society. Southern races are not treated as an ‘other’ within the West. Southern races stop holding onto multi-generational grievances and learn to forgive instead of imitating Western leadership and trying to destroy things from the inside out. American Blacks denounce criminal and ghetto elements, attempt to pursue self-control over emotionalism and imitation.

Jews stop promoting themselves as some special or unique people, censoring all things that may be negative about them in Google, continuing to use the Holocaust as victim complex justification to kill Palestinians. Radical Islamists can stop causing vicious terror attacks, such as driving people over trucks in Berlin and Nice.

An end to the 1990s Office of Management and Budget’s Classifications on race with country-specific classifications, multi-selects, and granular reporting. A return to meritocracy in American college admissions.

Feminists, Southern races, and other vine-like people stop using politics, imitation, and censorship instead of ability to try and get ahead, they accept their relative place in the world while those who are of higher abilities should ensure their needs are considered for.

The United States leaves the Far East, Chinese investment in Western countries.

If we perhaps do not give serious consideration to the problems that all groups in the world face, we will be faced with the brutal situation of might makes right.

---

Here are some potential action items if you agree with the points raised in this article against the subtle tricksters of speech and communication, who through sophistry pollute the every day dialogue and tax the trust among peoples and nations.

Action Items

• If you are on the left, consider being more open-minded and straightforward. If you are on the right, consider being kinder.
• Create a non-Google search engine and media source which reveals the DIRECT SOURCE and TRUTH, which removes the vines’ intermediary power.
  • Search result rankings should be queryable based on the specific time something happened, and not change. Social media feeds should have logs and stores of the feed at given points in time which people can look back on.
• Ban infinite scroll. Replace with button that goes to “next page.”
• As a man, be aware of the manipulations of women and Southern Races around you. Discard them if they continue to do this and are not honest people.
• Stop caring about moral attacks. They don’t care about morality.
• Europeans should understand that they are being Great Replaced, and “anti-racism” is really a moral attack against their civilizations and societies from the Bantu-Judeo left and this may be more sinister than the overt Trump, because the unarmed threat is in this modern age more dangerous than the armed threat, because they would rally hundreds of thousands to their cause upon receiving consternment, subtly sabotaging yet proclaiming innocence, in way that water tries to drown steel.
  • (Is it not true that I find American leftists commonly represented in expats, parasitizing their way into Europe because their ideas destroyed their own society, only to now consume and try to destroy Europe? When Americans on the right have always proclaimed this to be their home, and that they hope for the betterment of it?)
• Use fact-based forms of the English language rather than emotionally degenerate forms. Understand who is playing an emotional game with you and recognize the answer in politics is power in numbers, hierarchy, and organization, not in debasing yourself to their level.
• Be aware of the subtle communications and intentions of Southern Races and women, such as saying things in roundabout ways or adding tonality to their voice to communicate.
• Beware the emotional miscegenations of women based on FOLDY EARS as an INDICATOR OF INTELLIGENCE, who seek to jump between different worlds in rotating polyandry, and create coalitions with other men.

Here is a summary:

note: todo

comments: contact@kaiwenwang.com